Comments Thread For: Hearn: If Wilder-Fury Does 1 Million+ Buys, I'll Give Wilder 50-50
Collapse
-
-
Wilder has 1 belt as well and is undeniably a more popular fighter than parker. He recieved a flat fee of 15 million which is 20% of 75 million. That's unjustifiable. He then received a 36 or 37% split (cant find the exact number). That's 4 or 5 percent more than parker.
Do you think wilder is only 4 or 5 % more popular than parker?Comment
-
Parker had 1 belt and no drawing power for the josh fight. He recieved 32.6 %.
Wilder has 1 belt as well and is undeniably a more popular fighter than parker. He recieved a flat fee of 15 million which is 20% of 75 million. That's unjustifiable. He then received a 36 or 37% split (cant find the exact number). That's 4 or 5 percent more than parker.
Do you think wilder is only 4 or 5 % more popular than parker?
Parker had ppv records prior to AJ's unification . If wilder was not fighting fury, would he be in ppv?
That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee.
He has no choice than to win or kiss good buy to the undisputed.Comment
-
Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing.
Parker had ppv records prior to AJ's unification . If wilder was not fighting fury, would he be in ppv?
That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee.
He has no choice than to win or kiss good buy to the undisputed.
"Parker had one belt same as wilder, so what's the fuss about 2% increase?"
to
"Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing."
And no, if wilder was not fighting fury, he would not be on ppv. However, do you think parkers ppv fights deserved to be on ppv?
“At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair." - Hearn
Where did you get all this from?
"That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee."Comment
-
Huh? Why the change of heart? You went from
"Parker had one belt same as wilder, so what's the fuss about 2% increase?"
to
"Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing."
And no, if wilder was not fighting fury, he would not be on ppv. However, do you think parkers ppv fights deserved to be on ppv?
“At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair." - Hearn
Where did you get all this from?
"That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee."
Smiles, you and I know that no way wilder gets 50/50 except this fight records at least 700k ppv.
What AJ needs to do is keep winning. Somebody else will definitely bring the green belt for undisputed. That's the target. "The Undisputed"Comment
-
Comment
-
500K is realistic but Fury doing a MASTERFUL job winning casual fans over here in the US and selling the hell out of this fight, excellent interview with Joe Rogan yesterday which is a huge Podcast with almost 4 Million Subscribers
Comment
-
Parker had 1 belt and no drawing power for the josh fight. He recieved 32.6 %.
Wilder has 1 belt as well and is undeniably a more popular fighter than parker. He recieved a flat fee of 15 million which is 20% of 75 million. That's unjustifiable. He then received a 36 or 37% split (cant find the exact number). That's 4 or 5 percent more than parker.
Do you think wilder is only 4 or 5 % more popular than parker?
I do
but yea, it is fkn bizarre that genius does not
Wilder OBVIOUSLY deserves as much as Parker, if not more
35% - 37.5% imho..... considering Parker got 32.5%
no way will 40% of the buyers be tuning in to watch Wilder, but he DEFINITELY deserves more than Parker
Wilder should jump on 35% for two reasons.....
1) those cvnts are super-difficult to deal with
2) he genuinely believes he can beat JoshuaComment
-
Huh? Why the change of heart? You went from
"Parker had one belt same as wilder, so what's the fuss about 2% increase?"
to
"Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing."
And no, if wilder was not fighting fury, he would not be on ppv. However, do you think parkers ppv fights deserved to be on ppv?
“At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair." - Hearn
Where did you get all this from?
"That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee."
I think he is from Laligalaliga landComment
Comment