Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: If Wilder-Fury Does 1 Million+ Buys, I'll Give Wilder 50-50

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Blond Beast View Post
    Right. Blew the math on that one. Embarrassing. I should have said 5% for each 100k buys?
    Yeah, that's a good spin on it. Giving Wilder/Finkel an incentive based deal is one that I could agree with.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
      That's the more reason he was offered 15mil initially. That's way beyond his drawing power until fury test run came in to the picture.

      The number is belts you have is also considered in the sharing formulae.
      Parker had 1 belt and no drawing power for the josh fight. He recieved 32.6 %.

      Wilder has 1 belt as well and is undeniably a more popular fighter than parker. He recieved a flat fee of 15 million which is 20% of 75 million. That's unjustifiable. He then received a 36 or 37% split (cant find the exact number). That's 4 or 5 percent more than parker.

      Do you think wilder is only 4 or 5 % more popular than parker?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Level37scythe View Post
        Parker had 1 belt and no drawing power for the josh fight. He recieved 32.6 %.

        Wilder has 1 belt as well and is undeniably a more popular fighter than parker. He recieved a flat fee of 15 million which is 20% of 75 million. That's unjustifiable. He then received a 36 or 37% split (cant find the exact number). That's 4 or 5 percent more than parker.

        Do you think wilder is only 4 or 5 % more popular than parker?
        Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing.

        Parker had ppv records prior to AJ's unification . If wilder was not fighting fury, would he be in ppv?

        That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee.

        He has no choice than to win or kiss good buy to the undisputed.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
          Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing.

          Parker had ppv records prior to AJ's unification . If wilder was not fighting fury, would he be in ppv?

          That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee.

          He has no choice than to win or kiss good buy to the undisputed.
          Huh? Why the change of heart? You went from

          "Parker had one belt same as wilder, so what's the fuss about 2% increase?"

          to

          "Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing."

          And no, if wilder was not fighting fury, he would not be on ppv. However, do you think parkers ppv fights deserved to be on ppv?

          “At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair." - Hearn

          Where did you get all this from?

          "That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee."

          Comment


          • War Beyonce! They will laugh when Wildher gets paid 100 million for Fury fight! War Beyonce!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Level37scythe View Post
              Huh? Why the change of heart? You went from

              "Parker had one belt same as wilder, so what's the fuss about 2% increase?"

              to

              "Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing."

              And no, if wilder was not fighting fury, he would not be on ppv. However, do you think parkers ppv fights deserved to be on ppv?

              “At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair." - Hearn

              Where did you get all this from?

              "That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee."
              Am updating you based on current happenings.

              Smiles, you and I know that no way wilder gets 50/50 except this fight records at least 700k ppv.

              What AJ needs to do is keep winning. Somebody else will definitely bring the green belt for undisputed. That's the target. "The Undisputed"

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
                You prove nobody wrong. You are only exhibiting your fan boy fantasies and leaving reality.

                I cannot help you on that.


                you cannot help anyone, with anything, alt

                says dumb shlt..... and then crawls up his own ass lol

                you clowns are a dime-a-dozen

                jog on

                Comment


                • 500K is realistic but Fury doing a MASTERFUL job winning casual fans over here in the US and selling the hell out of this fight, excellent interview with Joe Rogan yesterday which is a huge Podcast with almost 4 Million Subscribers

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Level37scythe View Post
                    Parker had 1 belt and no drawing power for the josh fight. He recieved 32.6 %.

                    Wilder has 1 belt as well and is undeniably a more popular fighter than parker. He recieved a flat fee of 15 million which is 20% of 75 million. That's unjustifiable. He then received a 36 or 37% split (cant find the exact number). That's 4 or 5 percent more than parker.

                    Do you think wilder is only 4 or 5 % more popular than parker?



                    I do

                    but yea, it is fkn bizarre that genius does not

                    Wilder OBVIOUSLY deserves as much as Parker, if not more

                    35% - 37.5% imho..... considering Parker got 32.5%

                    no way will 40% of the buyers be tuning in to watch Wilder, but he DEFINITELY deserves more than Parker

                    Wilder should jump on 35% for two reasons.....

                    1) those cvnts are super-difficult to deal with
                    2) he genuinely believes he can beat Joshua

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Level37scythe View Post
                      Huh? Why the change of heart? You went from

                      "Parker had one belt same as wilder, so what's the fuss about 2% increase?"

                      to

                      "Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing."

                      And no, if wilder was not fighting fury, he would not be on ppv. However, do you think parkers ppv fights deserved to be on ppv?

                      “At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair." - Hearn

                      Where did you get all this from?

                      "That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee."



                      I think he is from Laligalaliga land

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP