Let's have a discussion about this A side B side.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • N/A
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2017
    • 9269
    • 214
    • 0
    • 12

    #51
    Originally posted by kafkod
    Total Sporteck is a notoriously unreliable source for info about boxing
    And the Mirror is a notoriously unreliable source for info about anything.

    You have no way of knowing what the split was. Why would Finkel lie to me about what the split was? Why would AJ give Wladimir 50/50 when AJ was the champion and the bigger draw?

    It was 55/45. If you don't want to believe me, no problem. Take care.

    Comment

    • Boxfan83
      The Coach
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 15838
      • 2,100
      • 731
      • 160,371

      #52
      I firmly believe once a fighter makes a certain purse and wins, he should never be subject to less.

      Comment

      • QballLobo
        Undisputed Champion
        • Nov 2011
        • 7153
        • 1,310
        • 112
        • 48,002

        #53
        A side is always the guy that has more than one option to make big time money. They are in a position to make a take it or leave it offer.

        Comment

        • redmish
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2010
          • 2704
          • 84
          • 1
          • 31,461

          #54
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
          Lennox Lewis vs. Mike Tyson.
          Good shout even though Tyson was shot to śhit by then he was still a massive draw, as was Lewis.

          Comment

          • Eff Pandas
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2012
            • 52129
            • 3,624
            • 2,147
            • 1,635,919

            #55
            Originally posted by Marchegiano
            Whatever happened to , ya know, prizefighting?


            I don't understand why fans would give a **** about draw and not support a winner's take over this fighter gets X while this one gets Y.

            50-50 would be for those who are not confident. 75/25 for those who are. Why does either side need protected from their L?
            When did prize fighting die exactly btw? Cuz I know in the bare knuckle days a winners share was the rule or at least standard. But somewhere along the way of boxing becoming less about sports & more about asses in seats & more about ratings & PPV buys with more & more people watching it a winners share died.

            Not that I think thats wrong cuz it is an entertainment sport & with boxing being a every man for himself type business, unlike most sports at the business level, it makes sense for the guys who can draw to make more money.

            But ideally if all the top boxers were competing under the same umbrella vs other top guys then there would be a control quality with boxing that is comparable to other sports quality control & you could do more bonus sh^t & winners share stuff I believe. With how boxing is setup today it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to have a winners share for fights that already have a winners share built in pretty much cuz the A side guy is 80/20 to win.

            Comment

            • Eff Pandas
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2012
              • 52129
              • 3,624
              • 2,147
              • 1,635,919

              #56
              Originally posted by Boxfan83
              I firmly believe once a fighter makes a certain purse and wins, he should never be subject to less.
              So you want Floyd to make even more money vs Berto than he did Pacquiao?

              Comment

              • Eff Pandas
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2012
                • 52129
                • 3,624
                • 2,147
                • 1,635,919

                #57
                Originally posted by kafkod
                Total Sporteck is a notoriously unreliable source for info about boxing income and purse splits. They literally invent their own numbers and report them before the actual figures are announced just to attract gullible people to their site.

                I'm surprised that somebody who claims to be "an insider" would resort to using Sporteck as a source.

                The 50/50 split for AJ/Wlad was reported by multiple UK sources with more credibility than Sportek.
                LMFAO. The biggest sketchy mfer on this site is that mfer. I don't know why so many cats buy he's a real insider. Or 3 insiders cuz 3 mfers are supposedly paid to post on Boxing Scene for some reason or however the story goes.

                Meanwhile this dude acts like a 13 year old at least once a week (cuz while I got him on ignore mfers still quote his nutty sh^t). This is for sure not Jim Lampley's secret account or w/e the rumor might be with this bad troll.

                Comment

                • Boxfan83
                  The Coach
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 15838
                  • 2,100
                  • 731
                  • 160,371

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                  So you want Floyd to make even more money vs Berto than he did Pacquiao?
                  I never understood that fight for Floyd. Berto mustve had something on the Mayweather team to get that fight. But personally if I were a manager, I wouldn't have my client take anything less than his last big (million+) purse.

                  Comment

                  • Eff Pandas
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2012
                    • 52129
                    • 3,624
                    • 2,147
                    • 1,635,919

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Boxfan83
                    I never understood that fight for Floyd.
                    Sh^t you & me both.

                    I used to have a top 3 or so guys I felt were in the running for Floyd's next fight but with that Pac fight (which I never thought was gonna be made) & then that Berto fight even more so I went off the rails on calling Floyd opponents. And I only got worse on my predictions as that McConor fight should tell you. If Floyd comes back & fights a big ass possum I wouldn't be THAT shocked.

                    Berto mustve had something on the Mayweather team to get that fight. But personally if I were a manager, I wouldn't have my client take anything less than his last big (million+) purse.
                    Thats a hard road to maintain in boxing doe. There is so lil stability in opponent quality & appeal. I can see that in other sports where there is a minimal level of quality & appeal built into the sport. You kinda gotta pay the QB who keeps winning the super bowl more money. But boxers routinely go up & down in quality opponents.

                    Comment

                    • Vegemil
                      Errol Spence Nuthugger
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2016
                      • 4877
                      • 190
                      • 113
                      • 250,131

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                      LMFAO. The biggest sketchy mfer on this site is that mfer. I don't know why so many cats buy he's a real insider. Or 3 insiders cuz 3 mfers are supposedly paid to post on Boxing Scene for some reason or however the story goes.

                      Meanwhile this dude acts like a 13 year old at least once a week (cuz while I got him on ignore mfers still quote his nutty sh^t). This is for sure not Jim Lampley's secret account or w/e the rumor might be with this bad troll.
                      Don't worry if his 3 personalities ever try to sexually assault you I'll take the fall. I won't have my men harmed in the line of duty.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP