Let's have a discussion about this A side B side.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vegemil
    Errol Spence Nuthugger
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2016
    • 4877
    • 190
    • 113
    • 250,131

    #1

    Let's have a discussion about this A side B side.

    Why make excuses for a fighter claiming they're more popular or they're getting lowballed? The fact of the matter is the A side brings more money so they get a higher percentage. That's literally how a fair system works. Anybody claiming that one guy will generate 5m and the other generates 25m should get the same amount is an idiot.

    Now in terms of B side. I think the best you should do is try to get the terms as fair as possible so you can beat your guy up and become the A side. If you're not promoted well you gotta take the tougher road to get to the top of the mountain but you can get there.
  • Chuckguy
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 13927
    • 345
    • 183
    • 58,389

    #2
    Originally posted by Vegemil
    Why make excuses for a fighter claiming they're more popular or they're getting lowballed? The fact of the matter is the A side brings more money so they get a higher percentage. That's literally how a fair system works. Anybody claiming that one guy will generate 5m and the other generates 25m should get the same amount is an idiot.

    Now in terms of B side. I think the best you should do is try to get the terms as fair as possible so you can beat your guy up and become the A side. If you're not promoted well you gotta take the tougher road to get to the top of the mountain but you can get there.
    What’s your point? This is simple as I don’t get why people don’t understand

    Comment

    • Vegemil
      Errol Spence Nuthugger
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2016
      • 4877
      • 190
      • 113
      • 250,131

      #3
      Originally posted by Chuckguy
      What’s your point? This is simple as I don’t get why people don’t understand
      Exactly. It seems like something that would be a simple topic but we get new threads every day about who's right. If you look at it as fighter A and B instead of giving them names it's pretty clear what's blocking the fight.

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #4
        Yep it's simple. You only see biased fans trying to defend their fighter arguing that the B-side deserves 50% etc.

        Comment

        • Lopez_Boxing
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2017
          • 4655
          • 245
          • 81
          • 97,428

          #5
          I think it’s weird that there’s some guys around here that talk like They really know the numbers and percentages behind the scenes. Must be a lot of , promoters, agents, and managers logged in at all times

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #6
            Originally posted by Lopez_Boxing
            I think it’s weird that there’s some guys around here that talk like They really know the numbers and percentages behind the scenes. Must be a lot of , promoters, agents, and managers logged in at all times
            No they just keep up with the news being revealed by the fighters teams.

            Comment

            • CodeBreaker
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • May 2017
              • 526
              • 21
              • 50
              • 14,112

              #7
              Was there ever been a match up that there was no clear B-side?

              Comment

              • Vegemil
                Errol Spence Nuthugger
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2016
                • 4877
                • 190
                • 113
                • 250,131

                #8
                Originally posted by CodeBreaker
                Was there ever been a match up that there was no clear B-side?
                Keith Thurman vs. Shawn Porter came to mind for me but I didnt even delve into the prefight. They just seem like 2 fighters that are about even popularity wise. (When they fought)

                Comment

                • N/A
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jul 2017
                  • 9269
                  • 214
                  • 0
                  • 12

                  #9
                  Originally posted by CodeBreaker
                  Was there ever been a match up that there was no clear B-side?
                  Lennox Lewis vs. Mike Tyson.

                  Comment

                  • Scipio2009
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Apr 2014
                    • 13741
                    • 276
                    • 64
                    • 98,172

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Vegemil
                    Why make excuses for a fighter claiming they're more popular or they're getting lowballed? The fact of the matter is the A side brings more money so they get a higher percentage. That's literally how a fair system works. Anybody claiming that one guy will generate 5m and the other generates 25m should get the same amount is an idiot.

                    Now in terms of B side. I think the best you should do is try to get the terms as fair as possible so you can beat your guy up and become the A side. If you're not promoted well you gotta take the tougher road to get to the top of the mountain but you can get there.
                    The problem arises when there's dispute.

                    Wilder-Joshua at T-Mobile had enough value that the backers were willing to front $60m to stage the fight (Wilder would've likely seen the bulk of his take on the back end, but he wasn't going to show up with zero guaranteed money).

                    Eddie Hearn has already publicly argued that Joshua-Wilder was only worth $45m (with the last biggest fight seeing the main event fighters split $50m).

                    Joshua brings more money, but the fight is worth significantly more in Wilder's home market; logic says that there's got to be a way to square that opportunity cost, to keep the fight in the UK, right?

                    Vegas wanted Cotto-Alvarez for $15m, MSG wanted the fight for $20m. Solution? The agreed split was taken from the MSG offer and covered with the Las Vegas money.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP