I agree. Not sure why people are complaining about the numbers. Its Crawford were talking about, not Pacquiao. Bud is not near as big of a name as yet, Bob is still working on getting his name up. This number is actually really good for CRAWFORD considdering he only had 950K viewers just over a year ago in a unification fight against an undefeated Ndongo to become the Undisputed champ. I'm sure it will only climb from here.
Comments Thread For: Crawford-Benavidez ESPN Show Averaged 2.245 Million Viewers
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
The numbers aren't bad. I wonder what Crawford's numbers would be if he actually fought a real opponent that someone had heard of before?Comment
-
The problem is people trying to credit that 6 million to people tuning in to see Spence which was not the case at allComment
-
Good for everyone all around. Still though, it'd be nice to see fighters more than 1-2 times a year.Last edited by doom_specialist; 10-16-2018, 11:12 PM.Comment
-
I don't mind the PPV price to be honest. While you are correct that it is way overpriced compared to what you guys pay, we also don't have all that many of them now that Mayweather/Pacman are pretty much done. We will have had two PPVs all year, while there are almost 10 PPVs in the UK, possibly more. Heck, you guys have like four or five in a two month period which is crazy. Usyk/Bellew, Whyte/Chisora, Frampton/Warrington and Wilder/Fury.
Boxing is going to be just fine stateside. The ESPN and FOX deals will help it out, especially if we get top level match ups.Comment
-
First, Crawford-Postol PPV was a massive flop - 50-60k buys. Arum actually came out and said that he lost money.
Second, just because a boxer's biggest fight to date was on PPV doesn't mean that every fight will be. Just because Wilder-Fury is PPV doesn't mean Wilder-Brezeale will be.Comment
-
Comment
Comment