Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Conte Supports Decision To Deny License To Billy Joe Saunders

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
    He was also still proclaiming Canelo's innocence after he had been charged, found guilty and suspended!
    Nonsense Canelo was/is innocent, of any drug charge you know that, again he was charge for negligence not for getting any advantage over his opponents by cheating like you claim. He was exonerated of any punishable wrong doing other than negligence, as of now Blow Job Sounders is guilty of "negligence" lets wait and see what happens, if he is an "honorable" man, and follows the sanctions imposed, just like Canelo did by not fighting in Mexico even though he had green light to do so.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by whoseyourdaddy View Post
      Just like hypocrisy is biting Kafkod in the ass? agreed

      What he is doing is reversing the Shït this deluded Kafkod did against Canelo. nothing more, nothing less.
      I didn't observe or don't recall Kafkod's position on that so I can't really comment, but if that is indeed the case, then both are hypocrites. Does that make anything I said untrue? We're all responsible for our own words, man. Just because you believe someone else to be a hypocrite (or anything else for that matter) it doesn't excuse that same behaviour in yourself now, does it? Quite the opposite, in fact, I would have said.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View Post
        I'm noticing you're not spotting the hypocrisy in your own behaviour, man. I do seem to recall you proclaiming Canelo's innocence to every man and his dog a few months ago when in fact the evidence was inconclusive either way. You forgotten about that? I shouldn't be so quick to throw around accusations of hypocrisy, man, cos that **** can bite you on the ass.
        Originally posted by whoseyourdaddy View Post
        Just like hypocrisy is biting Kafkod in the ass? agreed

        What he is doing is reversing the Shït this deluded Kafkod did against Canelo. nothing more, nothing less.
        Canelo - charged with 2 PED offences, found to be guilty after an enquiry and suspended.

        BJS - not charged with any PED offence.

        I'm asking you again .. can you spot the difference there?

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View Post
          I didn't observe or don't recall Kafkod's position on that so I can't really comment, but if that is indeed the case, then both are hypocrites. Does that make anything I said untrue? We're all responsible for our own words, man. Just because you believe someone else to be a hypocrite (or anything else for that matter) it doesn't excuse that same behaviour in yourself now, does it? Quite the opposite, in fact, I would have said.
          My position on Canelo was that he was found guilty of a PED offence, so deserved to be punished.

          I didn't say he deserved to banned for life!

          I also believe, looking at the evidence and circumstances, which I won't go into here, that he probably was cheating.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by kafkod View Post
            Did you never come across the term, "presumed innocent until proven guilty" while you were working as a counselor?
            All the time BUT in my eyes and in the eyes of everybody else as of now, it seems(I hope) like negligence on BJS's part, meaning he could have used any other nasal spray without the Oxilofrine, even if they're less potent just to avoid this ordeal is that too hard to comprehend?

            Try you did exactly the same thing with Canelo, by saying he would not be in the position he is in if he would've avoided Meat all together. why are you changing your own position? why are you flip-flopping now? is it because blood is thicker than water and any other person non Briton is/should be measure diferent? is that it?

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
              So your dumbazzz has no clue for sure just like you didn't with Canelo yet with Canelo you condemned him over a month before he suspended long before any evidence came out. So it's fine to rush to judge Canelo without facts and before he is suspended but not Saunders? You 2 faced bytch LMAO
              Do you want to accept my bet or not, weasel?

              Comment


              • #67
                This is like a meth addict telling a crackhead you need to get help I understand victor conte has been tryng to reinvent himself in this last decade but he sounds kinda condescending.

                But, Saunders know better just needs to accept the punishment and move on

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                  The difference between what and what?

                  And has BJS hasn't been stripped of his title. Get your facts right if you want to play the "I'm smarter than you game"
                  Then why the Hell is he appealing the WBO sanctioning body for? It's because he no longer has their Middleweight title and is no longer recognized as their Middleweight champion?

                  Just admit at this current moment that he has been stripped of his WBO middleweight title. There will be a WBO Middleweight title fight involving Demetrius Andrade but not with Billy Joe Saunders.

                  It's for the interim WBO middleweight championship pending Billy Joe Saunders appeal which he will inevitably lose.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by champion4ever
                    Then why the Hell is he appealing the WBO for? It's because he is no longer has the title and is no longer recognized as their Middleweight champion?

                    Just admit at this current moment that he has been stripped of his WBO middleweight title. There will be a WBO Middleweight title fight involving Demetrius Andrade but not with Billy Joe Saunders.

                    It's for the interim WBO middleweight championship pending Billy Joe Saunders appeal.
                    BJS has not been stripped of his title!

                    He may end up getting stripped, but as of now, BJS is still the WBO MW champion.

                    If you're saying he has been stripped, then post a link to wherever it was that you think you saw that reported. Otherwise, stop pestering me with this rubbish.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                      You and Conte would have a point .. if oxilofrine was listed as an ingredient of the nasal spray BJS used. Going by the VADA statement, it wasn't listed as an ingredient:

                      "oxilofrine may have resulted from the administration of ephedrine which was also detected but below the decision limit of 11ug/ml. The estimated concentration of ephedrine is 4.6 ug/ml."

                      If oxilofrine wasan't listed as an ingredient, then both you and Conte are talking rubbish. BJS is a boxer, not a chemist. How was he supposed to know that taking a legal dose of ephedrine could make someone test positive for oxilofrine?
                      I agree with this. If this oxilofrine is such a potent PED what the hell is it doing in nasal spray anyone can get without a prescription? Next thing you know coffee and tea will be banned as stimulants. This holier than thou Conte used to help athletes to cheat. He should use his high tec conditioning program on himself modified for his older age. He is really fat. He is way too happy and celebrating Saunders's fate.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP