GGG talks the talk while Canelo walks the walk. "154-168 EZFOMI"- CANELO

[bigdunny1]

You are arguing other sh^t you ******. And the "goalpost" ain't got nothing to do with resume like I've said every time you brought up resume bs.



I'm making it complicated? You're the one bringing up SRL sh^t from the old timey modern days. You're bringing up resumes.

This whole thing is about the best guy in a division moving up to a new division to fight the worst title holder. Nothing more, nothing less. And you are bringing up side sh^t & extra sh^t & old timey sh^t that has little to do with my comparison.



I don't even watch football. Quit with this silly ass other sport comparison when there is a comparison to make with Broner AND Sugar Ray getting sh^t for cherry picking a title.

Ask why isn't broner treated like canelo? Ignores the most obvious answer...you tell me the sport you watch other then football and I'll draw it out in crayons so you can understand it. Broner hasn't beaten the same level of fighters before moving up dumbazzz. That's why broner is a joke and doesn't get the same credit as canelo and tons of other greats who did what canelo is doing. Yeah the fact that canelo just beat the without a doubt number 1 middleweight in the world and top p4p ranked fighter before moving up to grab a strap at 168 is the same as broner beating nobody and then jumping up to 147. Damn you embarrassing yourself. Just take your L and stop this foolishness.

[bigdunny1]

Fielding or Vanes. Fielding has no chance of beating Canelo and Vanes had no chance if beating Golovkin. So both fights were and are stinkers.Fielding may last longer because he's bigger but even that is debatable.

False equalivant. One guy is a world champ, active and top 10 ranked at the weight the fight is happening at. The other is retired coming off a loss, only 1 win in the last 4 years was not even top 10 ranked at 154 his natural weight and has never been world champ and hasn't fought in 2 years and was dragged up to 160 for the first time in his career. One opponent is clearly better then the other but you GGG fanboys can't even admit to something as clear and cut as this is why it's hard to have any respect for you guys. If fielding is a bum then vanes is a bum times 10.

[Eff Pandas]

Ask why isn't broner treated like canelo? Ignores the most obvious answer...you tell me the sport you watch other then football and I'll draw it out in crayons so you can understand it. Broner hasn't beaten the same level of fighters before moving up dumbazzz. That's why broner is a joke and doesn't get the same credit as canelo

Is SRL a joke? Is Canelo better than SRL in your opinion? SRL got more sh^t about the Donny Lalonde fight than Canelo seems to be getting for the Rocky Fielding fight.

[bigdunny1]

Is SRL a joke? Is Canelo better than SRL in your opinion? SRL got more sh^t about the Donny Lalonde fight than Canelo seems to be getting for the Rocky Fielding fight.

Stop moving goal post who said canelo is better then sugar Ray? Stop moving the goal and stop creating strawman arguments. Canelo like sugar Ray beat the best then jumped up weight for a belt just like Roy Jones did just like Manny Pacquiao did. Did broner? No that's why nobody cares about that clown and he's not treated the same as these great fighters who were already proven great beat elite fighters before jumping up for a belt. Still don't understand the difference dummy? Still crying that broner who didn't do what canelo and other greats did isn't treated like them? SMH Again this is the dumbest comparison. And you a clown for asking this question why isn't broner treated the same then refusing to acknowledge the answer which is obvious he didn't fight or beat the best before jumping up those guys did. Canelo already has a great resume already beat the best 154 and 160lbers before taking a jump at 168 broner didn't at any weight before jumping to 147. Keep spinning and I'll just keep embarrassing your azzz.

[TonyGe]

False equalivant. One guy is a world champ, active and top 10 ranked at the weight the fight is happening at. The other is retired coming off a loss, only 1 win in the last 4 years was not even top 10 ranked at 154 his natural weight and has never been world champ and hasn't fought in 2 years and was dragged up to 160 for the first time in his career. One opponent is clearly better then the other but you GGG fanboys can't even admit to something as clear and cut as this is why it's hard to have any respect for you guys. If fielding is a bum then vanes is a bum times 10.

Do you believe its reasonable to say Fielding will beat Canelo and or even that its competitive.

[bigdunny1]

Do you believe its reasonable to say Fielding will beat Canelo and or even that its competitive.

No matter who canelo faced in December they weren't going to have a great chance of beating him. Canelo is elite one of the best p4p in the world still peaking. You need to be a elite fighter to have a chance of being competitive.

My point is if Canelo fought lemieux you would of complained calling him a bum even though lemieux despite have 4 horrible losses is the second best opponent GGG has beaten. Fielding is better then Vanes and 80% of the opponents GGG has beaten and you still hear complaints. The fact that canelo is facing these caliber fighters on short turn around as a voluntary fight shows the much higher standard canelo is being held to compared to GGG. And I'm fine if you want to do that but you have to first acknowledge that Fielding at 168 would be a top win on GGG resume. Meanwhile either guy lemieux or fielding doesn't even crack canelo top 10 wins and he's younger then GGG. He is chasing greatness and doing things GGG told his fans he would do half a decade ago...move to 168. You can't shyt on lemieux/fielding without indirectly taking shots at GGG entire resume because these guys are both better and more accomplished then damn near all the guys GGG has beaten.

[.!WAR MIKEY!.]

Canelo represents everything right in boxing and ggg everything wrong with boxing. One guys talks it the other guy does it.


Canelo has conceded to catch weights for elite guys like Cotto & Mayweather. ggg? Forces everyone to come to him, even welterweights.


It's Canelo that has taken the big risks in his career, given us big fights. ggg on the other hand, Wade, Brook, Martirosyan, Lemieux yuck.

I almost 99% cent agree with you cause your spot on but I have to correct one thing you said.

GGG was willing to concede to a catchweight for the great Gabe Rosado, however Rosado told GGG to respect boxing and decline GGG offer for a catchweight and chose to fight GGG at the full 160 limit.

[Eff Pandas]

Stop moving goal post who said canelo is better then sugar Ray?

Holy f#ck you got a negative IQ. I was asking you your opinion on if you think SRL is better than Canelo or not. I didn't put words in your mouth. Legit question cuz you brought SRL into the debate.

And bro you're saying Broner got effed with cuz he's dogsh^t.
Fair play he's dogsh^t now, but I say & KNOW he was a highly considered guy when he made that bs move he made vs Paulie. You keep saying that matters. I disagree, but w/e.

But now you brought up the SRL title cherrypick situation which I wasn't even thinking about, but I agree with you on. That was equally as bs a title shot move up situation as Canelo's & Broner's. AND SRL isn't a doghs^t fighter like you can argue Broner is. AND SRL got sh^t on for that fight.

Hence why did Broner & SRL get sh^t on for their bs move up fights, but Canelo is getting touchdown dances for this Rocky Fielding fight? I say all that sh^t is the same.

Certainly you'd agree SRL's & Canelo's situation are similar cuz you f#cking brought it up in the first place?

[TonyGe]

No matter who canelo faced in December they weren't going to have a great chance of beating him. Canelo is elite one of the best p4p in the world still peaking. You need to be a elite fighter to have a chance of being competitive.

My point is if Canelo fought lemieux you would of complained calling him a bum even though lemieux despite have 4 horrible losses is the second best opponent GGG has beaten. Fielding is better then Vanes and 80% of the opponents GGG has beaten and you still hear complaints. The fact that canelo is facing these caliber fighters on short turn around as a voluntary fight shows the much higher standard canelo is being held to compared to GGG. And I'm fine if you want to do that but you have to first acknowledge that Fielding at 168 would be a top win on GGG resume. Meanwhile either guy lemieux or fielding doesn't even crack canelo top 10 wins and he's younger then GGG. He is chasing greatness and doing things GGG told his fans he would do half a decade ago...move to 168. You can't shyt on lemieux/fielding without indirectly taking shots at GGG entire resume because these guys are both better and more accomplished then damn near all the guys GGG has beaten.

No I wouldn't call Lemieux a bum. I don't think he's a bum at all. He's not the world's best boxer but he has power and good hand speed. I don't think Fielding is a bum either. IMO Lemieux has a better chance than Fielding in the unlikely event of an upset. As I said before Fielding may last longer because of his size but Lemieux has a punchers chance. One thing Fielding could do is impose his size on Canelo. Get inside and clinch make Canelo work and wear him down. He's not going to outbox Canelo. Of course your going to disagree.

[bigdunny1]

Holy f#ck you got a negative IQ. I was asking you your opinion on if you think SRL is better than Canelo or not. I didn't put words in your mouth. Legit question cuz you brought SRL into the debate.

And bro you're saying Broner got effed with cuz he's dogsh^t.
Fair play he's dogsh^t now, but I say & KNOW he was a highly considered guy when he made that bs move he made vs Paulie. You keep saying that matters. I disagree, but w/e.

But now you brought up the SRL title cherrypick situation which I wasn't even thinking about, but I agree with you on. That was equally as bs a title shot move up situation as Canelo's & Broner's. AND SRL isn't a doghs^t fighter like you can argue Broner is. AND SRL got sh^t on for that fight.

Hence why did Broner & SRL get sh^t on for their bs move up fights, but Canelo is getting touchdown dances for this Rocky Fielding fight? I say all that sh^t is the same.

Certainly you'd agree SRL's & Canelo's situation are similar cuz you f#cking brought it up in the first place?

No I didn't you phuking clown. Stop moving the goal post and creating straw-man arguments. You said why are we throwing a touchdown celebration for Canelo but Broner was killed when he moved up and fought the worst belt holder in paulie. Ignoring the most obvious answer which is canelo like other greats had ALREADY beaten the best at the lower weights where he was champion and Broner avoided them and didn't fight them didn't prove himself at those lower weight BEFORE moving up. That's a huge difference your dumbazzz is ignoring and the key reason Broner was shyt or brushed aside when he did it and was then even more amplified when he finally stepped up to face top fighters and lost badly. It's really not complicated to see why there is a huge difference in how both fighters were treated canelo has already beaten GGG, Cotto, Lara, Trout, ect the best at 154 and 160. I've explained it clearly to you but you keep trying to muddy the waters and push the goal post and put words in my mouth all because you can't just admit you came up with a re tarded comparison.

As for Sugar Ray you are again lying your azzz off

Is SRL a joke? Is Canelo better than SRL in your opinion? SRL got more sh^t about the Donny Lalonde fight than Canelo seems to be getting for the Rocky Fielding fight.

Stop playing ****** nobody killed him for moving up to fight Lalonde. The only heat he took WAS AFTER he beat Lalonde. And that was because folks felt he was allowed to keep the new belt hostage. He moved back down in weight and continued fighting smaller fighters while holding this belt. Similar to the heat Floyd took AFTER winning the 154 belt at 152 then moving back down to fighting welterweights for 2 years while still being allowed to hold and defend the 154 belt at 147 against welterweight fighters. The precedent fans and the belt orgs used to explain that nonsense and him not getting stripped was Sugar Ray Leonard. But it's again another way you are going full re tard by pretending when after Leonard beat Hagler and announced he was going up to fight Lalonde pretending it was treated the same when Broner announced he was going up to fight Paulie after cementing his greatness by beating Gavin Rees. lol Yeah no difference at all can't understand why Broner was being criticized LMAO