Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Loeffler Will Speak To Golovkin About Charlo Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Verus View Post
    It was a smart business decision on GGG's part. The Vanes fight was zero risk and more than offset the expenses incurred in preparation for the Cinco de Mayo fight with Canelo. But at the same time, it reinforced the idea that GGG feasts on lower level fighters and struggles with top-level fighters. Plus move destroys the idea that his cheerleaders advance that GGG is an all-time great who fights the best available fighters.
    I'd probably agree with you had he actually not fought Canelo. He also fought Jacobs. I don't think that Vanes fight destroyed anything: you sound too categoric and overdramatic. C'mon...it was a better fight than Fury vs Seferi, at least both of them took it seriously. While it lasted.

    Comment


    • Nobody wants 3 straight Canelo vs GGG fights. Give it a rest . Charlo vs GGG is a great option that clears things up affords GGG ability to earn 3rd fight and gives Charlo ability to earn that 1 big name win.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Vnecaxa View Post
        Why everybody think that GGG should fight the top contenders when he is no longer the champion and ginger fight second level fighters? The trilogy is not going to happen. People lost interest in boxing and they prefer the UFC or WWF.
        Are you saying that people would rather watch 2 sweaty guys in speedos roll around on the ground on top of each other?

        Blame the illuminati for feminizing men!

        Comment


        • A Lemuiex win over Spike hardly makes Lemuiex a big name. BJ boxed his ears off.

          Comment


          • God how f-n DUMB

            I can't believe you can't see the double fix...

            Oscar..You are Sooooo Slick... And Suliman..
            WHAT AN whole licker...

            GGG champ had Charlo mandatory...

            Suliman & Oscar get together. Remember Lil Red puss did not want his belt REMEMBER..

            Now lets do that December thing with???

            Let me see CHARLO? NAAAA Lets fight David LA PEWWW

            & screw some more money out of the fools that will buy this one.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
              This has nothing to do with Canelo. It was Loeffler who cried and put in a formal request asking them to let GGG jump the line in front of Charlo and become Canelo's mandatory. If not for that then after his voluntary he was going to be mandated to fight Charlo. WBC is actually trying to help GGG out and saying you want the fight in May then beat Charlo and you get it. They could of said phuk you GGG you had 2 cracks already it's Charlo's turn and you can work your way back up the ranking like anybody else. This is the compromise they made because Loeffler crying begging them to mandate the fight and skip Charlo.
              But Golovkin beat Canelo twice now and the WBC doesn't want him to win a 3rd time! If that were to happen no more cash cow and no more PPVs for Canelo! See how this business works?

              Comment


              • Fight a good opponent to secure position not put on a bubble suit and Blabb Blab Blab. Nice matchup: Triple jab vs Triple Blab

                Comment


                • Prior to Jacobs fight GGG's resume of 10 years fighting bums is shameful. Look at monster results then fights two top fighters and nada. Just put your signature in your post . CEO, GGG Fan Club

                  Comment


                  • Make it happen.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by robbyheartbaby View Post
                      it was so refreshing to read a post with some sense thank you! All the keyboard warriors on here read this post and get a clue!
                      Appreciate it I'm also seeking out reason on this forum, but for the most part it feels like looking for a needle in a haystack.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP