Originally posted by dukesville
View Post
1. I have no problem with Canelo's voluntary defense for his next fight.
2a. The WBC should have mandated either a rematch vs. Golovkin with no conditions (meaning Golovkin doesn't have to fight Charlo) for Canelo's first mandatory defense.
OR
2b. The WBC should have ordered Charlo as the next mandatory defense for Canelo without conditions (meaning Charlo doesn't have to face Golovkin).
Can't be any clearer than that.
Comment