Boxrec #233 heavyweight in WBA's top 15

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • N/A
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2017
    • 9269
    • 214
    • 0
    • 12

    #91
    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
    Higher rating = better does it not?
    No, it doesn't. It means you've proven more. Just because someone is unproven doesn't mean they wouldn't beat you.

    You must have no life though because you keep trying to start arguments nobody is interested in. My position is that Wilder couldn't be #2 if he'd only fought bums. You refuse to discuss that, because you know I'm right, so you keep changing to subject to random topics.


    Klitschko was better than Wilder according to boxrec.
    That's a lie. Klitschko was more deserving of a higher rating. Doesn't mean he was better. If higher rating always equaled better, there'd be no reason for anybody to fight each other.


    You don't agree. So is boxrec only evidence/proof when you agree?
    Boxrec is great proof of whether you've only fought bums or not. The claim that Wilder has only fought bums is clearly a lie because he wouldn't be #2 otherwise.


    According to boxrec Whyte has beaten more current top 20 HW's than Wilder, so how is he by far ahead?
    Wilder is #2. Whyte is #5. Wilder has twice as many points as Whyte. If Wilder has only fought bums, what does that say about Whyte?

    Doesn't mean Wilder would definitely win if they fought. Just means Wilder has accomplished more and deserves the higher rating.

    Comment

    • Robbie Barrett
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 40891
      • 2,779
      • 667
      • 570,921

      #92
      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
      No, it doesn't. It means you've proven more. Just because someone is unproven doesn't mean they wouldn't beat you.

      You must have no life though because you keep trying to start arguments nobody is interested in. My position is that Wilder couldn't be #2 if he'd only fought bums. You refuse to discuss that, because you know I'm right, so you keep changing to subject to random topics.




      That's a lie. Klitschko was more deserving of a higher rating. Doesn't mean he was better. If higher rating always equaled better, there'd be no reason for anybody to fight each other.




      Boxrec is great proof of whether you've only fought bums or not. The claim that Wilder has only fought bums is clearly a lie because he wouldn't be #2 otherwise.




      Wilder is #2. Whyte is #5. Wilder has twice as many points as Whyte. If Wilder has only fought bums, what does that say about Whyte?

      Doesn't mean Wilder would definitely win if they fought. Just means Wilder has accomplished more and deserves the higher rating.
      How has Wilder accomplished more? Whyte has beaten more top 20 fighters. According to boxrec. Wilder has beaten 1, Whyte has beaten 3.

      Boxrec is only good for records. It's ratings suck.

      Is Mayweather the best boxer ever? Boxrec says so.

      Comment

      • N/A
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2017
        • 9269
        • 214
        • 0
        • 12

        #93
        Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
        How has Wilder accomplished more? Whyte has beaten more top 20 fighters. According to boxrec. Wilder has beaten 1, Whyte has beaten 3.
        You're picking a random arbitrary criteria. Cong**** to Whyte for beating more fighters currently ranked in the top 20. Thankfully, Boxrec doesn't pick one random criteria to benefit a specific fighter like you're doing.

        If we're picking random arbitrary criteria, I could bring up that Wilder has beaten two consensus top 4 fighters in his criteria, while Whyte has beaten zero. I could bring up that Wilder has beaten someone in Boxrec's current top 7, while Whyte hasn't.

        But rather than cherry pick biased arbitrary arguments, Boxrec takes into account everybody you've fought, everybody they've fought, etc. Boxrec can get fooled by bogus decisions, but Wilder beats everyone by knockout, so there's no question his Boxrec rating is legit.


        Boxrec is only good for records. It's ratings suck.
        Thank you for your opinion. Even if you believe that, it still would be impossible to reach #2 only fighting bums.


        Is Mayweather the best boxer ever? Boxrec says so.
        I won't comment on fighters from before my time, but in the 30 years I've been closely following the sport, Mayweather was clearly the best pound for pound.

        Comment

        • Laligalaliga
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2018
          • 6439
          • 71
          • 11
          • 90,109

          #94
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
          Your knowledge is non-existent, so that's not surprising.



          Look at the heavyweight rankings. The WBC heavyweight rankings are clearly the strongest.
          I didn't force you to key into my knowledge. Your opinion doesn't matter so you can keep it to yourself.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP