I know what the bolded quote means, which is why I bolded it. You obviously don't. It says: "oxilofrine may have resulted from the administration of ephedrine"
Not "oxilofrine may have come from the same source as the ephedrine."
?
You seem to be misunderstanding the quote and seem to be suggesting it ephedrine converted into oxilofrine. Thats not what the report is saying. It IS saying it is possible its from the same source. It is also just speculation and why it specifically says OPINION next to it. Im trying to explain it to your dumb ass. Some people you just cant reach.
I have allergies and there are only about 3 different drugs used in nasal sprays. There isnt that much variation out there.
Go google it, find me one that uses it, because there isnt. Its not that hard to look.
Chemistry and human biology are very complicated. You get to understand them by studying for years at university .. not by reading the list of ingredients in a nasal spray!
Chemistry and human biology are very complicated. You get to understand them by studying for years at university .. not by reading the list of ingredients in a nasal spray!
All you had to do was show me a website of a nasal spray product containing oxilofrine.
Didnt happen.
Can you show me one where it says ephedrine can metabolize into oxilofrine ?
You seem to be misunderstanding the quote and seem to be suggesting it ephedrine converted into oxilofrine. Thats not what the report is saying. It IS saying it is possible its from the same source. It is also just speculation and why it specifically says OPINION next to it. Im trying to explain it to your dumb ass. Some people you just cant reach.
Why don't you stop reaching and just read the quote from the report?
It does not say that oxilofrine may have come from the same source as the ephedrine.
It says oxilofrine may have resulted from the administration of ephedrine.
If I was a pro boxer, and wanted to cheat... Id just look for products that can contain a specific banned substance that i wanted to use... And have it in my back pocket... In Canelos case the tacos, in silly hoe Saunders case, the nasal spray... Like, I feel it's just to easy to actually cheat and get away with it. Why aren't people demanding a hair follicle test? What were the levels of this substance silly hoe took and what is considered a beneficial level? Will he be held acount by signing to vada 365? Thia cannot be a slap on the wrist and that's it! The world cried when canelo failed and he submitted to hair follicle and is now enrolled to vada 365... Silly hoe Saunders should be held to the same criticism and standard.
The drug in question has an extremely short lifespan within the body and has very little effect of any at all after it has been purged or dissipated.
He's WBO.. he doesn't have to do any type of 365 VADA. That's WBA (questionable) and the CBP operated by WBC.
Errol Spence has fat gyno ******* which are a red rag to a bull for people calling PEDS..( For the record I think he's clean ) and isn't doing any type of 365 as IBF champ .. why aren't you asking him to be tested?
BJS is a dirty ****.. a nasty person and general lowlife. But he is a clean boxer.. even if he does train at the ingle gym.
Comment