That's a lie. The reason the media is on Finkel's side is because he's proven himself to them by showing emails to key media members.
If Hearn can brainwash you into getting somebody's name wrong, he can brainwash you about anything.
Hearn was the one that insisted he'd send a contract with AJ's signature, publicly claimed he sent a contract with AJ's signature, only to be exposed as a liar.
It's not that AJ's signature was necessarily legally needed, it's that Hearn is such a pathological liar he just can't help himself. So Finkel simply pointed that out.
Hearn also challenged Winkel to do it. Does that mean that Hearn is telling the truth? We are talking about the same Winkel that was saying “how can Joshua not sign the contract and let Hearn sign it” knowing full well Hearn has power of attorney but purposely attempting to manipulate public perception.
Hearn was the one that insisted he'd send a contract with AJ's signature, publicly claimed he sent a contract with AJ's signature, only to be exposed as a liar.
It's not that AJ's signature was necessarily legally needed, it's that Hearn is such a pathological liar he just can't help himself. So Finkel simply pointed that out.

Comment