Now we know why GGG wanted no part of Ward

[buddyr]

Most likely Ward would of handed Gennady his first loss

But he wanted no part of Ward because he was chasing and got 2 Canelo paydays and a better chance of winning the fights compare that to 2 Ward paydays the choice is obvious anyone in his shoes or his team would have made the same decision

This scared talk is f.ucking ******ed though , elite fighters aren’t scared Canelo wasn’t scared of Gennady , Gennady wasn’t scared of Ward , Danny wasn’t scared of Thurman or Lucas , Mayweather wasn’t scared of PAC

Keith Thurman is terrified of Spence. Every time he gets around spence he turns in to a ***** and starts telling corny jokes for laughs

[Curt Henning]

my favorite thing ive seen in the last 3 days is golovkin fans suggesting he move up to 168 "and maybe even 175"...175?!?!?! jfc u wanna see golovkin get murdered? no business at 175....yet I saw someone suggest and when I told them they are dumb as **** a bunch of his gggroupies defended it like it could happen and ggg would be good...lol..hed get murdered by joe smith@175

[R_Walken]

Keith Thurman is terrified of Spence. Every time he gets around spence he turns in to a ***** and starts telling corny jokes for laughs

Sure buds

It was less then 2 years ago Keith was the boogeyman and everyone at WW was supposedly afraid of him now all of a sudden he went b.itch made

F.uck off

You’re a clown if you actually believe that

[Curt Henning]

ggg fans also

"ward cant sellout in his own hometown of Oakland...ward cant sell tickets and nobody knows who he is...he is not relevant"

then

"ward cant lose a decision in vegas"

as if ward brings sold out arenas and ******** whales to vegas...LOL...u cant make this stuff up

[dibzvincent143]

36 or 26 year old version. The results would have been the same

True to a certain extent. But this thread is base solely on his 35-36 yr old performances. It’s like basing pac’s performance base on his Vargas and horn days.

I’d like to think he’d put on a better show during his peak, and if your not bias you’d agree.

[Curt Henning]

True to a certain extent. But this thread is base solely on his 35-36 yr old performances. It’s like basing pac’s performance base on his Vargas and horn days.

I’d like to think he’d put on a better show during his peak, and if your not bias you’d agree.

the problem with golovkin is we aren't sure what hed do against elite fighters at his peak because we never saw it.....whether its his fault or not we just don't know

we cant be sure that the version of golovkin that beat Curtis stevens would beat current canelo because..lets face it...its Curtis stevens...who was beaten by marcos primera and jesse Brinkley........we aren't really sure what golovkins peak really was because theres a lack of elite fighters on his resume

[dibzvincent143]

the problem with golovkin is we aren't sure what hed do against elite fighters at his peak because we never saw it.....whether its his fault or not we just don't know

we cant be sure that the version of golovkin that beat Curtis stevens would beat current canelo because..lets face it...its Curtis stevens...who was beaten by marcos primera and jesse Brinkley........we aren't really sure what golovkins peak really was because theres a lack of elite fighters on his resume

He was able to compete well during his late age against an elite prime fighter in Canelo. For me that’s enough evidence he’d do slightly — if not totally better — in his prime.

Watching his performances and training videos, we can already compare the vast difference in his speed today and 6 yrs ago.

It’s like saying oscar wouldn’t perform better in his prime against Floyd when he was able to hang in there and win 4 rounds when he was 34 and inactive.

Seriously no pressure attacker in history have gone better at 36 than they were, lets say 30.

[stealthradon]

[Curt Henning]

He was able to compete well during his late age against an elite prime fighter in Canelo. For me that’s enough evidence he’d do slightly — if not totally better — in his prime.

Watching his performances and training videos, we can already compare his speed today and 6 yrs ago.

It’s like saying oscar wouldn’t perform better in his prime against Floyd when he was able to hang in there and win 4 rounds when he was 34 and inactive.

Seriously no pressure attacker in history have gone better at 36 than they were when they were at 30.

sure...but beating up Curtis stevens and Daniel geale....and kell brook....and willie Monroe...and gabe Rosado....proves nothing

at least we know what Oscar was in his prime.....

heck...even old Miguel cotto was able to destroy danny geale....and cotto aint no MW.....stevens was beaten by D level guys

every guy look faster at 30 than they do at 34-36...but g's comp level leaves a lot to be desired...makes it nearly impossible to say how hed fare

hes fought one elite fighter...and one guy below elite level....and that's really it.....and he only has 1 close win over the less than elite danny jacobs

[NorvernRob]

Ward would have totally schooled him and Froch would have beaten him half to death. GGG has never been hard to hit and that kind of fighter was bread and butter to Froch.