Comments Thread For: Canelo-Golovkin: We Saw it Coming

[angkag]

Anyone saying GGG got robbed, in which there were quite a few.

Minority though, of those who thought Golovkin won, Lou DiBella summed up whatI'm hearing most frequently.


Lou DiBella
✔
Loudibella
Thought GGGboxing won, but this was no robbery. I’m gutted for Gennady, who has every reason to think he won TWICE without a victory. He will not be any younger for the third Fight, which you can bank on. Canelo will be a legit favorite in #CaneloGGG3. #Boxing is a tough biz.

6:12 AM - Sep 16, 2018
932
442 people are talking about this

(need to figure out how to cut/paste tweets better)

[doom_specialist]

that article..... is why you don't judge a fight using compubox

I thought it was just me. This article gives Alvarez as little credit as it can, while making Golovkin the best guy that ever got 2nd.

[angkag]

Turns out Malignaggi used the R-word.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ob7F8znPH8o

MMA world reaction - go argue with that lot if you disagree

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmxvry8QTzM

And one who called for Canelo on the night reacting live (keeping it balanced).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc1oriHdCgA

[kushking]

Turns out Malignaggi used the R-word.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ob7F8znPH8o

MMA world reaction - go argue with that lot if you disagree

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmxvry8QTzM

And one who called for Canelo on the night reacting live (keeping it balanced).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc1oriHdCgA

Thats why I already said Fáglignaggi is the most biased fanboi in boxing commentary,he has ALWAYS hated canelo & has never ever had anything good to say about him,he lost against Angulo,Lara,trout,was losing to kahn supposedly if you were to take fanboi fàglinaggis word for it.

But it surprised me tstreet seems to actually be keeping it real,I know he hates gbp because of the letter scandal & was boycotting the 1st fight telling everyone to watch may v mcgimper instead.

[aboutfkntime]

I thought it was just me. This article gives Alvarez as little credit as it can, while making Golovkin the best guy that ever got 2nd.

yea..... compubox - even if correct, and I wonder sometimes - is only relevant to stat-keepers, not to judges

it is not about volume, it is about clean hard punches and effective aggression

and it is more important who wins the exchanges and who controls the fight rather than who lands something that can technically be described as a punch

the judges know what to look for

the people who are arguing that Golovkin won the boxing match are forgetting that Canelo won the fight.....

..... also, Golovkin demanded that Canelo stand and fight like a Mexican..... but when he did, Golovkin backed up

THAT COUNTS !

[EDD1]

Anyone considering that Golovkins trainer aknowledged, in a way, that his fighter lost?

[joesaiditstrue]

Look at their faces, that is why ggg lost, because canelo, just like in the first fight... Landed the cleaner harder punches every round.

Most people scored the fight for GGG, regardless of your hyperbole. He won both fights, yet only one judges card in BOTH fights had hi. winning. Sick that A-side **** though, you're not a real fan, just a **** rider.

[BigStomps]

What is the point of your comment? No, seriously, why would you waste time on making this idiotic remark that adds zero value to the discussion? If you disagree - fine, we can talk about it and discuss things on merit using arguments, facts, perceptions, opinions.. But instead that degenerative fart in the wind.

P.S. Any support for a fighter form the opposite corner for you and many others on this forum translates into "****riding" or "sucking balls". Its interesting how your first thought goes down there and into the realm of h0mosexuality. Freud would be quick to jump to conclusions here. Just come out already, no shame in that, be who you are and enjoy life, pumpkin

P.P.S. The fact that you want to come across as a boxing fan with all its masculinity only points to an idea that you might be compensating... Be honest with yourself, bro

I am being honest. The fact is you love to swing off Triple g's nutts like George of the jungle.
That's all there is to it!
So who's the one hiding in the closet??
Maybe you should ask yourself that...

[Robi13]

Most people scored the fight for GGG, regardless of your hyperbole. He won both fights, yet only one judges card in BOTH fights had hi. winning. Sick that A-side **** though, you're not a real fan, just a **** rider.

And you must be one of the dumb phuck who believed the ggg fraud hype... I never even seen you post on here your name doesnt ring a bell but you have many post and i know you just changed your name like the coward you are. And New!!!! How that sound?! Awesome I know lol

[aboutfkntime]

I thought it was just me. This article gives Alvarez as little credit as it can, while making Golovkin the best guy that ever got 2nd.

I did not comment on whether the writer was biased or not

I mean, you could be right

I was just saying that compubox should NEVER be used to score a fight, even an amateur fight..... those stats are totally irrelevant

who won the exchanges and who controlled the fight, is more relevant..... in addition to clean hard punches and effective aggression

of the 4 official scoring criteria..... I thought Canelo won all of them

clean hard punching
effective aggression
ring generalship
defence