Comments Thread For: Canelo-Golovkin: We Saw it Coming

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Canelo-Golovkin: We Saw it Coming

    By Tris Dixon - SO that is that. Everything has been settled. It might take a while for the dust to settle in the desert but we now officially know there is nothing much between Gennady Golovkin and new middleweight ruler Saul Alvarez and that if they meet again it will likely be close and competitive. But we also know that if they have a third collision then the man they call Triple G' will be 37...
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • djbiancafrost
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • May 2016
    • 139
    • 13
    • 19
    • 10,933

    #2
    Mad props to both. Id be honest i was rooting for GGG but after i saw the fight, it was clear that Canelo wanted it more than GGG. He wins 7 out of the 12 rounds. The scorecard could be swayed anyway but looking as to who has more energy every end of the round, it was Canelo. Kudos to him. Hope GGG comes back and get the other IBF or WBO belt soon.

    Comment

    • Robi13
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2015
      • 8235
      • 805
      • 91
      • 348,081

      #3
      Look at their faces, that is why ggg lost, because canelo, just like in the first fight... Landed the cleaner harder punches every round.

      Comment

      • sammybee
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 3752
        • 123
        • 2
        • 29,462

        #4
        Canelo was sharper, faster and more improved.

        GGG wants retirement package in the trilogy.

        He knows he won't win that fight.

        Comment

        • alexjust
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2017
          • 2094
          • 369
          • 80
          • 34,736

          #5
          I look at the first fight in light of the second one now. If Canelon has improved so much as everyone acknowledges and still barely escaped a second draw, isnt that in a way a proof that he undoubtedly lost the first one?

          Comment

          • Guy3008
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Dec 2015
            • 159
            • 4
            • 0
            • 7,841

            #6
            Golovkin had to KO Canelo to win. He should have known that but didn't do enough. Shame on him for not delivering a knockout and not trying enough. He can only blame himself.

            Comment

            • alexjust
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2017
              • 2094
              • 369
              • 80
              • 34,736

              #7
              Originally posted by sammybee
              Canelo was sharper, faster and more improved.

              GGG wants retirement package in the trilogy.

              He knows he won't win that fight.
              Of course he won't. He is unlikely to knock Canelo out. They will fight in Vegas again because Canelo won't go anywhere else. Again it will be a Mexican holiday. And again there will be another decision. And we know how decisions are made in Vegas when a golden boy is in the ring. So yeah... he will lose the third fight. He should just squeeze De La Hoya's balls again and make him pay up. At least he will earn butt load of money. In my mind he will always be a true winner in this corrupt, shltty sport. They did it to Kovalev, they did it to GGG. Who is next truly gifted but naive fighter who will be rolling the dice against the house in Vegas?..

              Comment

              • Robbie Barrett
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2013
                • 40891
                • 2,779
                • 667
                • 570,921

                #8
                Very biased article. Only talks about what Golovkin did during the fight. Writers for other sports don't show this kind of bias that is rampant in boxing writers articles. Very unprofessional and misleads casuals into thinking what the writer wants them to believe.

                Comment

                • A.K
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2014
                  • 11052
                  • 280
                  • 79
                  • 71,066

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                  Very biased article. Only talks about what Golovkin did during the fight. Writers for other sports don't show this kind of bias that is rampant in boxing writers articles. Very unprofessional and misleads casuals into thinking what the writer wants them to believe.
                  There is NO ONE more biased than you hypocrite ass boy

                  Comment

                  • Robbie Barrett
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 40891
                    • 2,779
                    • 667
                    • 570,921

                    #10
                    Originally posted by A.K
                    There is NO ONE more biased than you hypocrite ass boy
                    Even if that were true, i'm not a reporter/writer. They should be giving unbiased opinions and facts. The most famous one (fat dan) is one of the worst. Boxing media is trash.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP