Comments Thread For: Jacobs-Derevyanchenko IBF Purse Bid Postponed Until July 10
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Yes, g didn't vacate to fight Canelo. He vacated to fight Vanes.
That is just a simple fact. g asked for an exemption to fight Vanes instead of his mandatory. G was told he could fight Vanes, but he had to fight Derevyanchenko by Aug. 3rd. g chose to vacate and fight Vanes. It has absolutely nothing to do with Canelo. He was ordered to fight Derevyanchenko, but g vacated.
Literally. g vacated to avoid a bum with 12 pro fights. This would be like Spence vacating instead of fighting Ocampo.
g and his lil butt-lickers are the only ones crying. I know it is so unfair to expect a champ to be fight a guy who had once thought about fighting a top 30 opponent. Yes, of course g did the right thing. He let two fighters that have testicles fight for the belt.
g has a resume full of Rubio, geale, Monroe, wade, Brook, and Tureano and to top it off, he vacates to avoid someone with a dozen pro fights. And is crying about it.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
This fight represents a huge risk with little reward for Jacobs. He's already in a prime position to face the winner or canelo-GGG, plus, This dude is not known to the public, so Jacob will be expected to win fashionably, but the truth is this is a 50/50 fight. It's a no-win situation for Jacobs; if he wins, he was supposed to win. If he loses, he lost to unknown dude with like 13 fights. If he does decide to take the fight, big respect to him.Comment
-
Jacob's looking for a real fight like Arias rematch or Sulsucky rematch. The guy is a joke of LHW with his slapping punches fighting at middle weight. For sure he won't take a fight if the IBF mandates a 2nd day weigh in.Comment
-
Exactly. The guy keeps saying he was stripped for fighting Vanes. He wasn't. He was stripped for making it clear that he was trying to make another fight instead of the mandatory fight.Comment
Comment