Clear to you based on what?
Wrong. That's not how contracts work. He'd be bound by whatever he signed, not by what Hearn claimed on IFL.
I'm not saying he expected Wilder to fall for it. But clearly Hearn's decisions were motivated by a desire to fight Povetkin first and delay Wilder until 2019.
Wilder isn't Finkel's only client. It didn't take him two weeks to review the contract. He's had the contract for less than two weeks. He'd had the contract one week when he said he'd send a signed contract later in the week and that one week delay was caused by Hearn refusing to put in the contract that the fight would be next.
If Wilder had signed and he wasn't next he can just pull out the fight and say I signed to be next.
It's bizarre you and others on here think Eddie is out to trick Wilder into signing some dodgy agreement.
When Wilder is now is Finkel's only client and it takes him 2 weeks to review a contract it is clear Finkel didn't want Deontay to take the fight.
Comment