Prime Pacquiao vs Crawford or Spence. Who wins?

[WesternChamp]

Meaningful or meaningless?

Is English your first language?

simple typo, meaningless. you got the point. no english is not my first language, it's actually my 3rd language.

[IronDanHamza]

simple typo, meaningless. you got the point. no english is not my first language, it's actually my 3rd language.

Ah, well that makes a lot of sense now.

[WesternChamp]

Ah, well that makes a lot of sense now.

yeah, makes perfect sense that raheem fought "literally" nobody.

[IronDanHamza]

yeah, makes perfect sense that raheem fought "literally" nobody.

If Morales who's just beaten Pacquaio in his fight prior is a nobody then ok cool he fought nobody.

[WesternChamp]

If Morales who's just beaten Pacquaio in his fight prior is a nobody then ok cool he fought nobody.

did you not see my previous post regarding this??

and you're hella reaching. the post you quoted me, i specially said he fought one know fighter (morales) and then he literally fought nobody after that.

im not sure why you're trying to twist my words into me saying morales is a nobody? english is your first language right?

[chrisJS]

knock out is in 2012. i thought we were talking prime manny here?

39 year old welterweight Marquez is hardly prime. 39 is a larger number than 33 therefore Marquez was older and more past his prime. He also didn't really have any significant win over 135 either so he was disadvantaged more at the weight too.

[WesternChamp]

so he fought morales. who else????? so he fought one guy that is known and all of a sudden he's the best now? i mean in that case ggg is the best too then right? LMAO!

You said he fought literally nobody.

You know what the word "literally" means right?

Raheem dominated Morales after he'd just beat Pacquaio. So I guess Pacquaio's win over Morales is meaningless if Raheem beat literally nobody.

Or are you changing it to literally nobody + 1?

not sure how that translate to morales = a nobody? lol

[WesternChamp]

39 year old welterweight Marquez is hardly prime. 39 is a larger number than 33 therefore Marquez was older and more past his prime. He also didn't really have any significant win over 135 either so he was disadvantaged more at the weight too.

but the post you quoted, i was talking about prime pacquaio. (08-10) lol

[WesternChamp]

39 year old welterweight Marquez is hardly prime. 39 is a larger number than 33 therefore Marquez was older and more past his prime. He also didn't really have any significant win over 135 either so he was disadvantaged more at the weight too.

post you quoted, i was talking prime manny 08-10 being unstoppable. you brought up marquez, i said check the stats, pac is 2-1 against him. then you came back and said you'll go with the ko instead of the controversy win. that's 2012..... if marquez would have ko pac during 08-10 then yeah, you have a point. but marquez didnt finally beat manny until 2012.

[chrisJS]

post you quoted, i was talking prime manny 08-10 being unstoppable. you brought up marquez, i said check the stats, pac is 2-1 against him. then you came back and said you'll go with the ko instead of the controversy win. that's 2012..... if marquez would have ko pac during 08-10 then yeah, you have a point. but marquez didnt finally beat manny until 2012.

Actually somebody else posted that, maybe an alt of yours? He wasn't "unstoppable". Unstoppable would mean unbeatable which of course no fighter is and the reference is that it's not just my opinion, but a majority of Boxing fans in general believe Marquez won the second fight and Marquez, though great is not exactly Leonard, Duran, Hearns etc;

An "unstoppable" fighter doesn't win a debatable split decision that the majority felt was the wrong decision to Marquez who was probably no longer in his physical prime at that point.