Prime Pacquiao vs Crawford or Spence. Who wins?

[The Big Dunn]

2018 now and moving on,

Since raheem was mentioned, he was a lose lose option for pac to take, he goes for legacy and money wise with morales. God damn you imbeciles, eventhough he beat morales he aint great of a fighter so manny opted for legacy and money wise.

Raheem brings a zero enhancement on pacs career, and you imbeciles just think that pac duck him, if it was floyd it would be ducking coz we know how floyd works, let them old and get ktfo and fight him.lol

No he didn’t you tool. The fight was signed prior to Morales taking the fight with Raheem. It’s like bob knew morales might get his ass beat.

So after you beat morales, fight the guy morales beat. It’s not that difficult to get.

I do agree, time to move on.

[IronDanHamza]

so he fought morales. who else????? so he fought one guy that is known and all of a sudden he's the best now? i mean in that case ggg is the best too then right? LMAO!

You said he fought literally nobody.

You know what the word "literally" means right?

Raheem dominated Morales after he'd just beat Pacquaio. So I guess Pacquaio's win over Morales is meaningless if Raheem beat literally nobody.

Or are you changing it to literally nobody + 1?

[WesternChamp]

You said he fought literally nobody.

You know what the word "literally" means right?

Raheem dominated Morales after he'd just beat Pacquaio. So I guess Pacquaio's win over Morales is meaningless if Raheem beat literally nobody.

Or are you changing it to literally nobody + 1?

yeah, pac's win over morales is meaningful then if that'll make you agreed that he "literally" fought nobody. pac still has wins over other ATGs, if this will make you happy i'll let the morales fight go as a waste. so in conclusion, raheem fought nobody.

[WesternChamp]

No he didn’t you tool. The fight was signed prior to Morales taking the fight with Raheem. It’s like bob knew morales might get his ass beat.

So after you beat morales, fight the guy morales beat. It’s not that difficult to get.

I do agree, time to move on.

after he beat morales his status went up where as raheem went down lol. so why would manny take a step down for? think brotha, think!

[IronDanHamza]

I don't have a problem with changing my stance on your crush. I am not that enamored with anybody.

I told you archeologists to dig up how i used to do hopkins until he stepped up his game, then he earned my respect.

You mentioned Ray, Hearns, Crawford, and Spence in the same sentence. Once you found out how idiotic you sounded you tried to backtrack. Just own up to your garbage man. It'll be ok.

No of course you don't have a problem with it.

It's any normal, rational person that has a problem with your b*tch behaviour.

There is one thing "changing a stance" I.e I liked this guy in 2010 but in 2018 I don't" then there is the other end of the spectrum saying "Floyd is ducking Mosley and needs to hurry up and give us the fight the world wants to see" then years later saying "Mosley was shot and Floyd Cherry picked him"

The latter is pathetic behaviour that I'd expect from a 10 year old.

[WesternChamp]

"Unstoppable" is a stretch. There's a large amount that had Marquez beating him then. I was at that fight and most the people in the arena felt Marquez won and fight II was more of a Pacquaio crowd.

He looked incredibly good of course but there's more neutral observers that will say Marquez got that one over Pacquaio.

that's your opinion, at the end of the day pac is 2-1 against marquez. crawford and spence doesnt fight like marquez does.

[chrisJS]

that's your opinion, at the end of the day pac is 2-1 against marquez. crawford and spence doesnt fight like marquez does.

2 very controversial "wins" of which one the slight majority say Marquez won and the other the vast majority say Marquez won. I'll take the completely conclusive and indisputable KTFO victory over two debatable points "wins" that most don't even agree with.

[WesternChamp]

2 very controversial "wins" of which one the slight majority say Marquez won and the other the vast majority say Marquez won. I'll take the completely conclusive and indisputable KTFO victory over two debatable points "wins" that most don't even agree with.

knock out is in 2012. i thought we were talking prime manny here?

[WesternChamp]

2 very controversial "wins" of which one the slight majority say Marquez won and the other the vast majority say Marquez won. I'll take the completely conclusive and indisputable KTFO victory over two debatable points "wins" that most don't even agree with.

the only one who doesnt agree to it is the floyd fans and marquez fans. but im not surprise tho. 2-1.

[IronDanHamza]

yeah, pac's win over morales is meaningful then if that'll make you agreed that he "literally" fought nobody. pac still has wins over other ATGs, if this will make you happy i'll let the morales fight go as a waste. so in conclusion, raheem fought nobody.

Meaningful or meaningless?

Is English your first language?