Comments Thread For: Golovkin Accepts Golden Boy's Revised Offer for Canelo Rematch

[Steven Mccowan]

They losing sanctioning fees.

So there is no second day weigh in now for this fight right?

If the case first time Golovkin doesn't have to worry about that in how many years?

Ibf changed that rule after GGG vs Jacobs.

[Letmaku]

Good going for Oscar after being retired by a midget. GGG is great. Alvarez should go to war or die!?

[TonyGe]

And how many did lil g beat? NOT Jacobs or Nelo! And now lil g will lose for the 3rd time & we wont get the chance to see Jermall whoop lil g.

He beat both Jacobs and Canelo FYI.

[aboutfkntime]

Abel Sanchez insisted on testing starting earlier for the May fight than it did in 2017, that's why Canelo got caught out. But yeah .. cazzies like you wouldn't know anything about that.

hair follicle test doe..... ?

Canelo had no idea how that would turn out.....

..... unless, the positive result was due to accidental contamination

look, I have no idea..... but, neither do you

cool story bro

my point in that post was..... Golovkin will be fighting the exact same Canelo..... except, the better fighter will make the better adjustments

[aboutfkntime]

the fat red kid is gonna lite that boy up like a christmas tree

[SUBZER0ED]

I've been hearing a lot of crap lately; Offer on the table, offer off the table, looking for a fight with Jacobs, last and final offer, deadline, no way 50-50, ect. Let me know when the contract is signed, and the date and venue finalized, THEN I'll believe these hoes are for real.

[kafkod]

hair follicle test doe..... ?

Canelo had no idea how that would turn out.....

..... unless, the positive result was due to accidental contamination

look, I have no idea..... but, neither do you

cool story bro

my point in that post was..... Golovkin will be fighting the exact same Canelo..... except, the better fighter will make the better adjustments

Hair follicle tests don't prove anything and are easy to cheat, that's why none of the testing agencies use them.

[thack]

Boxing needs these fights and glad it's on .They don't need drug cheats .This will be more intense ,the feeling out is over!

[aboutfkntime]

Hair follicle tests don't prove anything and are easy to cheat, that's why none of the testing agencies use them.

link.....?

coz yea, pretty sure that you are talking bollocks

TESTING
Clenbuterol is excreted from the body in the urine and can thus be detected by analysis using such technology as mass spectrometry.

Currently the most sensitive equipment is capable of detecting Clenbuterol concentrations as low as 5-10pg/ml in the urine, but WADA only requires that an accredited laboratory be able to detect a level as low as 2ng/ml (a picogram (pg) is one-trillionth of a gram; whilst a nanogram (ng) is one billionth of a gram).

A typical dose used by an athlete might be in the range of 50-100µg (microgram, one millionth of a gram) or higher, and under these conditions, Clenbuterol may be detected in the urine for a week or longer after it was last consumed.

Since Clenbuterol is used on livestock to increase the proportion of lean meat, it can potentially be consumed by humans without their knowledge. In Europe, meat sold for human consumption is required to have a level of Clenbuterol less than 100ng/kg but elsewhere - particularly in China, Mexico and the Latin American region - standards may not be enforced.

Thus athletes who have tested positive for this substance in recent times have argued that their ingestion of this substance was accidental rather than the result of intentional doping.

Some scientists believe that this uncertainty might be alleviated by instituting a threshold for Clenbuterol — a level below which a positive would not be considered doping — but WADA has announced that it has no plans to change the status of the drug.

The current situation therefore remains: the outcome of each case is determined by whether or not an athlete can successfully argue that the evidence supports the conclusion that ingestion resulted from contaminated food.

Such evidence might include the location in which the meat was obtained or a hair test since Clenbuterol, like many other substances, accumulates in very small amounts in hair follicles. If an athlete has taken the substance over a period of time in the past, his/her hair test might return a positive for a period of six months or longer. Conversely, if the Clenbuterol resulted from a single incident, in which the subject had eaten meat for example, a hair test would almost certainly be negative.

[aboutfkntime]

the fat red kid is gonna lite that boy up like a christmas tree