Outlaw The WBC

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daggum
    All time great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 43683
    • 4,650
    • 3
    • 166,270

    #31
    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
    Don King never had to bribe Sulaiman. Don King was, by far, the most successful promoter, paying the biggest purses, and therefore the largest sanctioning fees.

    Don King and Bob Arum ruled boxing with an iron fist. Don King in bed with the WBC and Bob Arum in bed with the WBA. But Arum got his power with the WBA through bribery. Don didn't have to do that with the WBC because a thousand dollars here, five thousand dollars there wasn't going to mean anything to Sulaiman. Consistent 7 figure purses, with the WBC getting their 3% was far more incentive than rinky dink bribes.
    so shouldn't you change your name to wbc ibf? you know the wba is corrupt and yet you put it in your name

    Comment

    • Dolor
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jul 2012
      • 619
      • 141
      • 184
      • 11,823

      #32
      Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury
      Cry me a river *****. GGG better accept those more than fair Canelo terms, fight Charlo, or vacate. Enough cans for GGG now... he is surrounded. He has enough cans on his resume. Now he has to fight better opponents or be stripped .
      The fair way would be to enforce the Charlo fight for December, provided that he fights Derevyanchenko in September. If he doesn't fight Derevyanchenko in September, it would be OK to enforce Charlo for September.

      Comment

      • N/A
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2017
        • 9269
        • 214
        • 0
        • 12

        #33
        Originally posted by yammy25
        Yeah i mean.. the complete refusal of the WBC to sanction bouts unless King was promoter definitely wasnt corruption and greed at all ....
        I have never denied that the WBC plays favorites. From their inception, they have always catered towards making the biggest fights.

        However, you're stating some unproven accusations as absolute fact. Even if your claims are true, that signing with King made you more likely to gain favor with the WBC, clearly King was the WBC's preferred promoter as he paid the largest purses and therefore the largest sanctioning fees.

        Arum was focused on lower weight classes, with much much smaller purses, so the WBA had far more incentive than the WBC to focus on bribery.

        Comment

        • N/A
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 9269
          • 214
          • 0
          • 12

          #34
          Originally posted by daggum
          so shouldn't you change your name to wbc ibf? you know the wba is corrupt and yet you put it in your name
          My name is "WBC WBA IBF" because this account was created by three friends, each connected to a separate sanctioning body. Had nothing to do with who was or wasn't corrupt. Had to do with our ability to offer insight on the workings of these organizations.

          Had one of us been connected to the WBO, we would have offered info on the WBO as well.

          Comment

          • N/A
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2017
            • 9269
            • 214
            • 0
            • 12

            #35
            Originally posted by OCPancho
            Dude, you must be a paid WBC PR-Man.
            No, the WBC isn't who pays me.

            Comment

            • OCPancho
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2014
              • 2139
              • 54
              • 17
              • 31,860

              #36
              Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
              I have never denied that the WBC plays favorites. From their inception, they have always catered towards making the biggest fights.

              However, you're stating some unproven accusations as absolute fact. Even if your claims are true, that signing with King made you more likely to gain favor with the WBC, clearly King was the WBC's preferred promoter as he paid the largest purses and therefore the largest sanctioning fees.

              Arum was focused on lower weight classes, with much much smaller purses, so the WBA had far more incentive than the WBC to focus on bribery.
              You mean DK and Jose slept together .
              Arum greased WBC too .

              When the president breaks his own governing body's rules, he's taking a bribe.
              Those WBC conventions is a good time to bribe the Sulaimans.

              Comment

              • N/A
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jul 2017
                • 9269
                • 214
                • 0
                • 12

                #37
                Originally posted by OCPancho
                When the president breaks his own governing body's rules, he's taking a bribe.
                Those WBC conventions is a good time to bribe the Sulaimans.
                WBC rules clearly state the WBC can do anything they want if they think it's in the best interest of boxing. So it's not breaking the rules to change or bend the rules because their rules specifically allow that.

                Don King didn't need to bribe the Sulaimans at the convention. Usually Don King was paying for the entire convention, which was far more expensive than a rinky dink WBA bribe.

                Comment

                • Nay_Sayer
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 3837
                  • 182
                  • 1
                  • 49,922

                  #38
                  As I recall, you Bumlovkinites were in love with the WBC when they tried to twist Alvarez' arm and force him to fight the Triple Duck.

                  What happened? Is the honeymoon over?

                  LOL...

                  Comment

                  • OCPancho
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2014
                    • 2139
                    • 54
                    • 17
                    • 31,860

                    #39
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                    WBC rules clearly state the WBC can do anything they want if they think it's in the best interest of boxing. So it's not breaking the rules to change or bend the rules because their rules specifically allow that.

                    Don King didn't need to bribe the Sulaimans at the convention. Usually Don King was paying for the entire convention, which was far more expensive than a rinky dink WBA bribe.
                    I knew a manager who went to WBC convention and bribed for rating .
                    His boxer never faced a top 20 contender.
                    Yet, he got a mandatory title shot .

                    Comment

                    • Rock&Roll
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Jan 2016
                      • 798
                      • 74
                      • 3
                      • 13,208

                      #40
                      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                      No, the WBC isn't who pays me.
                      Who pays you?
                      What is your specific relationship to these org's?
                      The 3 of you are the PR for the alphabet org's, correct?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP