Comments Thread For: Is There Any Doubt That Lomachenko Is #1 Pound For Pound?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Well your entitled to your opinion. But let's not forget that Crawford gave Gamboa, Postol, and Indongo their first loss. He also schooled Diaz who only had one disputable loss against Lamont Peterson and was an Olympic gold medalist.
So that's why I have him ahead of Triple g.
Triple g fought nothing but B and C level fighters his whole career aside from Canelo and Jacobs and he struggled against both even if you had him winning both fights. At this point I don't even have him #3 to be honest.
You can make a case for Mikey and Sorungvisa being ahead of Triple g on the P4P list...Comment
-
Did you even see that fight? It seems like you are talking out of your ass.
First of all, it’s “Beat the brakes”, and second, overweight Salido barely managed an undeserved SD over Loma by landing dozens of blatant low blows and fighting dirty, without getting a warning, let alone point deduction.Comment
-
because he is a much better, more well-rounded fighter
if he was naturally the same size as Golovkin, or if Golovkin was naturally the same size as Crawford..... who would win?
Golovkin looks terrific against " available " scrubs..... but he went life-and-death with Jacobs and he could not beat the smaller Canelo..... some say he lost a decision in that fight..... I see the super-talented Crawford schooling him
and other than Jacobs/Canelo (who both gave him a *) Golovkin's resume has no real substance
Canelo lost that fight and got a giftComment
-
-
Lol..possibly ... but you had him at no 1 directly after his Salido fight so your vote doesn’t count...... LOMASEXUAL.... that username shows me you are as impartial as they comeComment
Comment