Originally posted by Mr. EBT 97K
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Is There Any Doubt That Lomachenko Is #1 Pound For Pound?
Collapse
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by Leonis View PostCrawford has the weakest resume of the 3. American fans and establishment are biased i cant see how you can make an argument for Terence being higher than GGG let alone Loma
So that's why I have him ahead of Triple g.
Triple g fought nothing but B and C level fighters his whole career aside from Canelo and Jacobs and he struggled against both even if you had him winning both fights. At this point I don't even have him #3 to be honest.
You can make a case for Mikey and Sorungvisa being ahead of Triple g on the P4P list...
Comment
-
Originally posted by King Jaffe Joffer View PostBud #1
Salido beat the breaks off of Loma ass
And Loma has what? 12 fights gtfoh
First of all, it’s “Beat the brakes”, and second, overweight Salido barely managed an undeserved SD over Loma by landing dozens of blatant low blows and fighting dirty, without getting a warning, let alone point deduction.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postbecause he is a much better, more well-rounded fighter
if he was naturally the same size as Golovkin, or if Golovkin was naturally the same size as Crawford..... who would win?
Golovkin looks terrific against " available " scrubs..... but he went life-and-death with Jacobs and he could not beat the smaller Canelo..... some say he lost a decision in that fight..... I see the super-talented Crawford schooling him
and other than Jacobs/Canelo (who both gave him a *) Golovkin's resume has no real substance
Canelo lost that fight and got a gift
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lomasexual View PostBoxing fans have him a #1.
People who are not actual boxing fans, but are fans of only specific boxers (or specific nationalities/races of boxes), don't have him at #1.
It's cut and dried. If you don't like Loma, you aren't a boxing fan.
Comment
Comment