>>> LOSING to Orlando Salido excludes you from P4P #1 status when...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chrisJS
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2007
    • 8989
    • 331
    • 64
    • 78,477

    #21
    Originally posted by Nay_Sayer
    So, are you arguing that Lomachenko is better than Leonard, Hearns, Hagler, Duran, and RJJ?
    No. YOU are. I'm applying YOUR logic.

    Lol at Sven Ottis being better than SRR. Your INSANE.

    Comment

    • Nay_Sayer
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2011
      • 3837
      • 182
      • 1
      • 49,922

      #22
      Originally posted by chrisJS
      Calzaghe > Roy Jones?

      He kicked his ass and was unbeaten.

      Calzaghe > Hopkins?
      Are you arguing that Calzaghe is better than Jones and Hopkins?

      Comment

      • Nay_Sayer
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2011
        • 3837
        • 182
        • 1
        • 49,922

        #23
        Originally posted by chrisJS
        No. YOU are. I'm applying YOUR logic..
        Sorry but NO.

        Comment

        • chrisJS
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2007
          • 8989
          • 331
          • 64
          • 78,477

          #24
          Originally posted by Nay_Sayer
          Are you arguing that Calzaghe is better than Jones and Hopkins?
          Dude, Calzaghe is undefeated.

          YOUR rules. Live by them.

          Comment

          • The Big Dunn
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 69777
            • 9,760
            • 8,080
            • 287,568

            #25
            Originally posted by chrisJS
            No. YOU are. I'm applying YOUR logic.

            Lol at Sven Ottis being better than SRR. Your INSANE.
            That wasn't his point. Seems you know this but are pretending it is because you don't agree with his opinion.

            Comment

            • Derranged
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2005
              • 46593
              • 2,126
              • 1,350
              • 162,628

              #26
              So nobody with a loss on their record can ever be P4P # 1? I was not aware of that rule.

              P4P lists are subjective mostly and I really don't care where Loma is ranked. But thread starter's anus is so sore he can't even fart without crying.

              Comment

              • BigZ44
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2015
                • 35528
                • 3,042
                • 1,200
                • 162,112

                #27
                Being undefeated is overrated, it looks nice but can be hollow. Who you beat is more important than who you lose to imo. With that being said, I've always hated the idea of P4P rankings and trying to compare guys achievements across different weight classes. Just think it's dumb extrapolations of unrealistic nonsense, just compare guys who fight at the same or near weight classes. Who gives a **** whether somebody thinks Sor Rungvisai's resume is superior to Oleksandr Usyk's? What the **** does it matter??

                Comment

                • chrisJS
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 8989
                  • 331
                  • 64
                  • 78,477

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Derranged
                  So nobody with a loss on their record can ever be P4P # 1? I was not aware of that rule.

                  P4P lists are subjective mostly and I really don't care where Loma is ranked. But thread starter's anus is so sore he can't even fart without crying.
                  People take p4p too seriously and create their own rules.

                  Pound for pound for a lot of people it's mainly who their favorite is or who they want it to be and change their rules accordingly.

                  Comment

                  • BigZ44
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2015
                    • 35528
                    • 3,042
                    • 1,200
                    • 162,112

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Nay_Sayer
                    Another nuthugger who thinks a win over Linares caliber fighters warrants P4P #1 status.

                    YDKSAB...
                    Again, I think P4P **** is one of the dumbest things about boxing, but with that being said, Linares is of higher quality than anybody Crawford has beaten

                    Comment

                    • DuckAdonis
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jul 2017
                      • 7775
                      • 197
                      • 84
                      • 188,446

                      #30
                      Almost everybody who knows boxing has Lomachenko p4p #1 right now. Get over it salty *****

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP