>>> LOSING to Orlando Salido excludes you from P4P #1 status when...
Collapse
-
Do this guy knows about Manny pacquiao? A guy with losses early on his record and then got to the top of P4P list.
Oh look thread fail!Comment
-
Valid points but you can also argue who did mikey or Crawford fight in their first 8 pro fights that was as experienced and dangerous as salido?
I’ll help you
NONE
NO ONE
so that kinda puts the argument to a reset doesn’t it?Comment
-
Comment
-
Leonard 3 losses, Hearns 5 losses, Hagler 3 losses, Duran 16 losses, Roy Jones 8 losses (brutal ones by some bums too) so according to tie casuals mentality about losses meaning you can't fight you can't qualify those guys.
Your rules would suggest GGG, Wilder, Joshua are all FAR better than those guys.Comment
-
No.
Crawford beat his Salido level opponents.
Garcia literally beat Salido.
Lomafako, OTOH, never bothered to avenge the LOSS.
Beating the likes of GRJ and Jorge Linares isn't enough to warrant P4P #1 status when A) you LOSE to the like of Orlando Salido and B) guys like Terrance Crawford and Mikey Garcia are *undefeated*.
1 + 1 = 2Comment
-
So, are you arguing that Lomachenko is better than Leonard, Hearns, Hagler, Duran, and RJJ?Leonard 3 losses, Hearns 5 losses, Hagler 3 losses, Duran 16 losses, Roy Jones 8 losses (brutal ones by some bums too) so according to tie casuals mentality about losses meaning you can't fight you can't qualify those guys.
Your rules would suggest GGG, Wilder, Joshua are all FAR better than those guys.Comment
Comment