Comments Thread For: Lomachenko vs. Linares - LIVE BoxingScene Scorecard
Collapse
-
Oh, it does? But what about how "the amateurs aren't the pros" thing? I've seen that one posted a lot, so it shouldn't matter much right?
Just tell me, who do you think is Mikey's best win?Comment
-
Nah Manny was a featherweight in his 30s, Floyd was already a WW.Dude, that’s also the Floyd-Manny size debate. Manny got a lot of credit for coming all the way up to welterweight from flyweight. But he was extremely young when he started. And by comparison, at the same ages, Floyd was fighting at similar weights as a amateur. But Floyd wasn’t as celebrated for moving up as much as Manny was.
Linares was the bigger guy. But it wasn’t as a big a size difference as some are making it out to be.
Manny and Floyd being same size is a fake debate.
Regarding Linares, he was bigger and he's a technical cat, beat an olympic gold medalist in campbell.
I never expected it to be easy.
Linares isn't getting caught anymore like he did younger.Comment
-
Garcia is taller and he has much bigger skeleton/body. As well as significant reach advantage. Google Garcia Loma and you shall see for yourself.
Considering Lomas antropometry (reach, shoulder width) he obviously can't follow up to Pac/Floyd/Roys move in weight class. A guy has significantly lower capacities for gaining body weight.
Loma have never fought lower than 57(featherweight, right?) since he was 17.Last edited by Gooldy23; 05-12-2018, 11:01 PM.Comment
-
Triangle theories don't work in boxing, sorry that's more excuses to **** on what is arguably a great boxer.Comment
-
Triangle theories don’t work when talking about who would win a head to head fight. But triangle theories sometimes can be used to see what level a guy is. It’s almost like moving a prospect. If he has trouble with the C and D level guys. It’s highly unlikely that he’s gonna be successful when he gets to the A and B level guys. It’s one thing for a guy to have a tougher than expected time to a guy a level or so below the level he’s supposed to be at. But when a guy loses multiple times to low level competition. It’s pretty safe to say he’ll never be an A level guy. We don’t know what Lomachencko’s ceiling is. But we do know Linares’s. And it’s a couple levels below world beaterComment
-
Comment
Comment