Comments Thread For: Sanchez: Golovkin's Power Would've Been Difference vs. Hopkins

[aboutfkntime]

There we go, that's a start. Now, keep posting the same post 100 times, and start quoting and responding to yourself. Throw in calling a few people ***wit, and my entertainment is lined up for the evening

it is easier to just copy/paste the same reply to your whining that I posted in the other thread lol

pointing out that Hypekin is not really about to break Hopkins record IS positive, son

the fact you are not aware of that, is highly amusing

what, you think any ol hypejob should be allowed to tip-toe through the tulips for his ENTIRE CAREER, and then retire with a bunch of roses without achieving anything meaningful?

e.g.

1) Golovkin was not the REAL WBA champ during most of his ****ty "defences"

2) most of those guys were fkn scrubs, so who cares anyway ?

[GGG Gloveking]

it is easier to just copy/paste the same reply to your whining that I posted in the other thread lol

pointing out that Hypekin is not really about to break Hopkins record IS positive, son

the fact you are not aware of that, is highly amusing

what, you think any ol hypejob should be allowed to tip-toe through the tulips for his ENTIRE CAREER, and then retire with a bunch of roses without achieving anything meaningful?

e.g.

1) Golovkin was not the REAL WBA champ during most of his ****ty "defences"

2) most of those guys were fkn scrubs, so who cares anyway ?

Im not the one on multiple threads crying like a little b itch over a fighter I don't like. That's you, kid. You're the one looking like a menstruating who're, complaining the same thing over and over. But keep it up, your ******ity s amusing

[aboutfkntime]

There we go, that's a start. Now, keep posting the same post 100 times, and start quoting and responding to yourself. Throw in calling a few people ***wit, and my entertainment is lined up for the evening

but because you do not appreciate my contribution, I am happy to keep quiet, and never mention Golovkin again

OK ?

I will start now.....













































































LOOOOOOOOOOL

nah, just kidding ahahah

[aboutfkntime]

Im not the one on multiple threads crying like a little b itch over a fighter I don't like. That's you, kid. You're the one looking like a menstruating who're, complaining the same thing over and over. But keep it up, your ******ity s amusing

no, you are here on multiple threads crying like a little b1tch over me

[TonyGe]

what, you think Murata is a money fight ?

you think that Golovkin will fight the cash-cow Murata for money?..... not to break Hopkins record against a no-hoper?

cool story bro lol

you guys tried to say that about Kell Brook, and yet Kell's OWN promoter said that he Never made a cent off a Brook fight lmao

Brook was unknown, and so the fk is Murata..... pull the other one

Of course if he decides to fight Murata he's doing it for the money and to break Hopkins record. It's not
an either or situation. You seem astonished that boxers are fighting for money and that there is something wrong with that except of course when Cotto paid step aside money to Golovkin so he could make big dollars. It's perfectly acceptable to you for Canelo to drop his title to avoid Golovkin. I didn't see you complaining when Cotto considered not paying Golovkin his step aside money. Your a hypocrite if the highest order. Mayweather fought a guy with zero pro experience to break a record. Where was your outrage. Your so noble I'm surprised you haven't made hundreds of posts expressing your disgust about that.

[aboutfkntime]

Of course if he decides to fight Murata he's doing it for the money and to break Hopkins record. It's not
an either or situation. You seem astonished that boxers are fighting for money and that there is something wrong with that except of course when Cotto paid step aside money to Golovkin so he could make big dollars. It's perfectly acceptable to you for Canelo to drop his title to avoid Golovkin. I didn't see you complaining when Cotto considered not paying Golovkin his step aside money. Your a hypocrite if the highest order. Mayweather fought a guy with zero pro experience to break a record. Where was your outrage. Your so noble I'm surprised you haven't made hundreds of posts expressing your disgust about that.

no

I am astonished that you clowns are STILL happily accepting that bullshht after embarrassing yourselves by making silly excuses to justify his no-hoper selection policy for MOST of his career

you guys told us that everyone was ducking..... and that Golovkin was genuinely trying to make big fights..... and that he wasn't a hypejob who was avoiding risky opponents

[GGG Gloveking]

no, you are here on multiple threads crying like a little b1tch over me

You don't know the difference between positive and negative, nor do you know the difference between crying and laughing. Is English your first language? If so, those Kiwi schools you went to did you a major educational disservice

[kafkod]

B-Hop, B-side, 2 attempts to weight-drain him, by 2 (Felix and Oscar) HOF fighters, and he beats both...by KO! How would B-Hop beat GGG?

Bernard Hopkins: I would have disarmed Golovkin, broken him down

And when asked about how he might have battled Golovkin, Bernard was -- as always -- confident that he has the answer.

"I would disarm him. And then I would make him fight the fight that I want to fight. Guys like that, they are so dangerous. The first job at hand is to disarm your enemy, your opponent," Hopkins said. "You have to disarm them. There's no negotiating, there's no figuring out. When a guy has something in his hand that's trying to hurt you, you must disarm him. And now let's fight.

"It starts mental. Everything starts from the head down, not from the feet up. So from the head down, this is science I'm speaking, I would disarm you mentally. Once I disarmed you mentally, you won't even use those hands you got."

https://www.badlefthook.com/2015/10/...roken-him-down

"And if that didn't work, I would grab him and hold on till the ref pulled me off. Then I would dive through the ropes and out of the ring, claim I was injured and couldn't continue, and get the fight ruled off as a no-contest."

[TonyGe]

no

I am astonished that you clowns are STILL happily accepting that bullshht after embarrassing yourselves by making silly excuses to justify his no-hoper selection policy for MOST of his career

you guys told us that everyone was ducking..... and that Golovkin was genuinely trying to make big fights..... and that he wasn't a hypejob who was avoiding risky opponents

Big fights. He just fought Jacobs and Canelo. He is probably going to go to Japan for another big fight. It may be a non event for you but for millions of people in Japan it's huge. It would if he is successful greatly expand his fan base. Smart move.

[Elroy The Great]

Hopkins would have cleaned up Golovkin's resume

and he would have cleaned up Golovkin

GGG has too many weaknesses against a top fighter

slooooow starter..... needs to plant his feet..... has trouble with fighters who can control distance..... is not a one-puncher..... is predictable, and a little one-dimensional with his attacks/combo's..... has slooooow hands.....

that fight would be Pavlik 2.0

and the one ''asset'' thats usually absent vs top guys is power. bhop would ruin 3g mentally before breaking him down physically.

possibly rjj vs paz level