Originally posted by chrisJS
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: What's Left For Gennady Golovkin To Prove?
Collapse
-
fk me
Golovkin's resume is.....
Lemieux
Jacobs *
Canelo *
he hasn't qualified for ANYTHING lol
it's not like Golovkin took all of those tricky fights that he was offered vs ex-champs/names, or like he put in a good effort vs Ward, or anything lol
we told you guys that Golovkin needed to step up if you guys wanted to call him great
hard luck for you that he did not
Comment
-
Originally posted by MC Hammer View PostCool, so you're on board with Deontay Wilder being in the HoF right? Been on top since 2015 and has 7 defenses of that belt Luis Ortiz is better than any of Golovkin's wins so they're about equal right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostGriffith was a much better boxer than Canelo, so yes, i'm saying he's better than Canelo and would beat him at 160.
Both looked shot .
Look at the size advantage by Monzon.
And his size advantage over Napoles ?
GGG gets criticized for fighting Brook and jr middles.
But, let's forget Monzon fought overblown welters as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostThe thing is it's seen and interpreted that he has 20 defenses. That counts more than what you think when it comes to historical context and what will go on the paper.
He has also got a tied record for most consecutive KO's in title fights too at 17. Tied with Wilfredo Gomez.
Those things will add up.
Comment
-
What's Left For Gennady Golovkin To Prove?.....
Golovkin needs to prove that he is ranked higher than #5 at middleweight
because..... right now, I can name 2 guys who would definitely beat him..... 2 more who would probably beat him..... and 2 more who would give him fits
loses to Jacobs, Canelo..... probably loses to Saunders, Charlo..... and has all sorts of problems with Derevyanchenko, Andrade
gone are the " middleweight is dead " excuses..... and gone are the "dey duckin me doe" excuses
waiting.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snoop Frog View PostGood question. I think he's borderline in right now, but I think it's justified if he doesn't get in with his current body of work.
CONS: below average strength of opposition
PROS: Best MW for ~4 years; undefeated after 40 fights
Gotta run to lunch otherwise I'd take more time to write more!
Comment
-
Originally posted by OCPancho View PostWhatever?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDrOu2LyNJg
Both looked shot .
Look at the size advantage by Monzon.
And his size advantage over Napoles ?
GGG gets criticized for fighting Brook and jr middles.
But, let's forget Monzon fought overblown welters as well.
For you to argue that Canelo is as good or better than Griffith is just plain crazy.
Brook and other JR Middles? Are you saying they are just as good as Griffith or Napoles?
Comment
Comment