who gives a fk what the WBA recognize ?


1) none of the other sanctioning bodies are ****** enough/greedy enough, to need 3 "champs" lol
2) the WBA have admitted that the regular/interim titles are bull****, and they have publicly pledged to get rid of them.....
..... so if even the WBA can admit/own up to, their own bull****..... then you casuals who are running with this rubbish are letting your panties show
even the WBA "officially recognize the regular" title is BULL****
the " regular/interim " champs exist so that the greedy WBA can milk more sanctioning fee's, you absolute muppet..... you just criticized Hopkins for defending the WBO title, and yet here you are justifying why the WBA can have three "champions"? lol
get a clue
that is like handing your wallet to a stranger because he told you that it belonged to him
Comment