Comments Thread For: Sanchez: Jacobs Looked Terrible, Not Same After Fighting Golovkin
Collapse
-
-
Dont waste too much time with the 24/7 haters/trolls on this forum. They are just a bunch of frustrated insecure losers in real life and devote their mere existence with obsession and hatred towards certain fighters, and spread lies, and a load of bullshit (but dont tell them that they actually help to rise the fighters popularity with the endless amount of posts)Comment
-
kid..... there is ONLY ONE qualifying criteria for greatness..... and it has nothing to do with amateur boxing
anything else..... is rubbish and fluffery
NO, how many divisions you represented has nothing to do with it
NO, how popular you were has nothing to do with it either
NO how many fighters your idiot fans insist ducked you has NO bearing whatsoever on greatness lol
tell me what that one thing is
this will be funnyComment
-
Dude at the end of the day, we both know what we saw in that first fight. It was not close. And in the second fight, I can understand Ward 'fans' thinking he was doing better...he was...but he shouldn't have been ahead at the time of stoppage and he did what he usually does in that fight, he got dirty and he got away with it.
Doesn't really matter, but we both know what we say. Everyone knows what they saw.Comment
-
Name one right now - when have you seen a guy get consistently outworked but his opponent doesn't get credit for the punches landed?
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Fl...Manny_Pacquiao
Floyd out-threw Pac by 6 punches....just face it man, Ward was not that good, he is way more hype than you are making GGG out to be. Watch some of Ward's fights for real.Comment
-
The point was when have you ever seen a guy throw 200 more punches, but land 30-50 fewer. And you cited a fight where a guy threw 70 more and landed a lot more?Comment
-
I agree
while Ward fans were (correctly) insisting that Ward was too skilled/well-rounded for Golovkin..... I always thought that the size difference would be Golovkin's biggest problem, and the largest influential factor in that fight
we..... seem to be agreeing on lots of points todayComment
-
'Ward connected on 166 of 463 punches for a connect percentage of 36%, according to CompuBox. For his part, Barrera landed 111 of 722 punches for a low connect percentage of 15%. What’s interesting is that Barrera threw 263 more punches than Ward in the fight. What this means is that Ward can be dramatically outworked by his opponents.'
'Both Fighters used rough tactics and both fought evenly through out the 12 rounds, Bika had a significantly higher work rate whilst it was ward who landed more accurracy - The fight went on during the super six super middleweight tournament, but this fight was not included in the tournament, Andre Ward was a participant of the tournament and was scheduled to fight Andre Dirrel, However with Dirrel dropping out due to injury (he sufferred against Abraham)and no replacement, Ward was allowed to fight Bika outside of the Tournament with Andre Ward's WBA title on the Line.
Majority of observers had the Fight a lot close in terms of rounds scored to each fighter than what the judges had'
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/An...vs._Sakio_Bika
Comment
-
Comment
-
FACT: they offered him 1.5mil, and then ran off to fight yet another scrub
not exactly how you make a fight, is it ?
then.....
FACT: they played hardball until well-after the eleventh hour, including calling for an early purse-bid..... which is, not exactly how you make a fight, is it?
they did everything they could to kill that fight, Golovkin had to be dragged kicking and screaming..... and we saw why during the fight
Comment
Comment