some clowns are really dug in and will make any case to defend their guy. lol I don't care how much syrup you pour on this steaming pile of shyt you ain't convincing anyone it's pancakes.
you guys are making him out to be a complete scrub but he lost a close decision to lara, a split decision to andrade and i didnt see the fight but the report im reading says the fight against charlo 'could have gone either way' and the scorecards were close.
So how come charlo and andrade are amazing opponents but vanes is a joke fight?
Not saying hes amazing but he certainly isnt some scrub by looks of it.
Makes me laugh, a lot of you guys wank over austin trout (see thread 'everyone should be like trout') but him and vanes both seem to have similar records, falling just short against the top fighters in the division.
In my opinion its a good stay busy fight which should go a few rounds as noone else has stopped him.
Looks more proven than derevyanchenko, unless you think vanes wouldnt be able to beat grandpa soliman.
Tweet
Comment