Wlad probably would've beaten Ali

[Stinger1]

It would be a good fight, I would slightly favor Wlad purely on size. Today Ali would be a cruiserweight.

[sunny31]

Usyk is a better technical boxer compared to Ali.

Ok the guy has fought 14 fights, I thought this was going to be a serious discussion. I'm out.

[Mr Objecitivity]

Usyk is not only a better technical boxer, but is also a superior athlete. No contest whatsoever!

[Sheldon312]

Ok the guy has fought 14 fights, I thought this was going to be a serious discussion. I'm out.

Ali is the better fighter while Usyk is a better boxer. There is a difference.

[MrFactor]

Maybe the 70's Ali. The Ali that beat Liston was very elusive. I think he could have been able to etch out a narrow decision over Wlad. The 70's Ali was much more flat footed.

[Derranged]

Ali was much better fighting backwards than forward. But Wlad would've had a hell of a time landing solid and he'd likely run out of gas from Ali's movement.

[DreamFighter]

Fury is not comparable to Ali. Fury's reach played one of the biggest factors to beating Wlad which Ali simply doesn't possess. Ali, due to his hilarious lack of punching power would pose even less of a threat than David Haye would to Wladimir Klitshcko.

And if one wants to compare a 39 year old Wlad to Ali. How about we compare a 39 year Wlad to 39 year old Ali in which Wlad would still be supreme over Ali.

you think? uif ali hadnt had Parkinsonians then he'd handle old wlad.

on primes wlads basic tools are jab and grab/smother until the low gassed opponent tires, then ko them. These are ineffective against ali, entirely.

[HarvardBlue]

I'll quote this so you dont have a chance to edit out the ******ity at a later date.

Trust me, that ******ity is embedded. No amount of editing will get rid of it.

[DreamFighter]

wow u cowards even waited till ali was dead to start these BS threads.

[DreamFighter]

Trust me, that ******ity is embedded. No amount of editing will get rid of it.

I fear this is the case.