More Entertaining Fight- Gatti-Ward I or Corrales-Castillo I?
Collapse
-
-
Golovkin vs Canelo was a display of great boxing skill but not the greatest fight from an entertainment stand point. Corrales Castillo was a fight where both guys demonstrated mediocre skill, just stood in the pocket the whole time and ****** away until one guy couldn't handle it anymore. Gatti Ward was far more entertaining.Comment
-
I've never understood the fascination for Corrales-Castillo 1. The fight was OK but I think the hype for the fight comes from the fact that it had a dramatic ending. I've seen far more action packed fights than that one.
So my pick is definitely Gatti Ward 1. I think a fight that doesn't get enough credit for being a great fight is Pacquiao Marquez 4.
Marquez-Pacquaio IV is my personal favorite event in sports history and favorite memory bar none and it was a great fight but not as entertaining as Corrales-Castillo I. I actually think the best overall fight of the series was fight II but IV had the drama and better result.
I think the best fight of the last quarter century is Morales-Barrera I.Last edited by chrisJS; 03-30-2018, 05:29 PM.Comment
-
Golovkin vs Canelo was a display of great boxing skill but not the greatest fight from an entertainment stand point. Corrales Castillo was a fight where both guys demonstrated mediocre skill, just stood in the pocket the whole time and ****** away until one guy couldn't handle it anymore. Gatti Ward was far more entertaining.
Ok so what was gatti v Ward skill wise for you? Must have been amateur skills if you think corrales v Castillo was “mediocre” skill wise. Lol
Corrales/Castillo displayed elite level infighting just because you’re not boxing off the back foot doesn’t mean the skill level is less.
Gatti v Ward was lesser skill without a doubt Castillo/corrales operated on a much higher level that’s a fact.Last edited by kidbazooka; 03-30-2018, 05:38 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Makes one wonder. Alt perhaps?Comment
Comment