Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Entertaining Fight- Gatti-Ward I or Corrales-Castillo I?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Corrales v Castillo was better and on a higher level.

    Gatti v Ward was fun too but Ward was a c level fighter and gatti B

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by kidbazooka View Post
      Corrales v Castillo was better and on a higher level.

      Gatti v Ward was fun too but Ward was a c level fighter and gatti B
      Sure.

      Gatti and Ward were too "inbred" for you, I'm sure.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Tony Trick-Pony View Post
        Sure.

        Gatti and Ward were too "inbred" for you, I'm sure.
        Wtf

        Relax bud

        Comment


        • #14
          Both all time great fights but im going with Gatti Ward. The momentum swing of that fight was crazy. One round you would think Gatti was schooling Ward. Then Ward comes charging back and so on. Corales Castillo was a war but the rounds were so evenly close except for that last round. Plus of course round 9 of Gatti Ward.

          Comment


          • #15
            Castillo vs Corrales was between two world class fighters.

            The stakes were so much higher as was the level of skill.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
              I'd say Castillo-Corrales. The skill level was a level above Gatti-Ward and I think perhaps even more sustained. I'd take Gatti-Ward round 9 as the better round than any in Castillo-Corrales but the dramatic ending of that one is unrivaled.
              i do agree with this

              its so obvious it almost doesnt even need to be said

              Comment


              • #17
                I've never understood the fascination for Corrales-Castillo 1. The fight was OK but I think the hype for the fight comes from the fact that it had a dramatic ending. I've seen far more action packed fights than that one.

                So my pick is definitely Gatti Ward 1. I think a fight that doesn't get enough credit for being a great fight is Pacquiao Marquez 4.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
                  I've never understood the fascination for Corrales-Castillo 1. The fight was OK but I think the hype for the fight comes from the fact that it had a dramatic ending. I've seen far more action packed fights than that one.

                  So my pick is definitely Gatti Ward 1. I think a fight that doesn't get enough credit for being a great fight is Pacquiao Marquez 4.
                  Pac-Marquez 4 is very underrated IMO. That was back and forth, with two guys who'd already squared up for thirty-six rounds and were no longer fooking around. You knew somebody was getting laid out.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Castillo vs Corrales and it's NOT EVEN CLOSE for me.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
                      I've never understood the fascination for Corrales-Castillo 1. The fight was OK but I think the hype for the fight comes from the fact that it had a dramatic ending. I've seen far more action packed fights than that one.

                      So my pick is definitely Gatti Ward 1. I think a fight that doesn't get enough credit for being a great fight is Pacquiao Marquez 4.
                      Because there’s levels to it and Castillo v corralles was a level skill wise above ward v gatti.

                      But some ppl rather watch two bar fighters (not calling gatti Ward that just saying)swing away than two prize fighters perform at a higher level so each there own.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP