I have no clue what rounds 97 won, just going with what everyone is saying
Wrong, Hector. Below is my card and the thread I posted it in. If you look at that post you'll see that I said I kept it in a memo on my phone. However since then my phone got messed up and I wound up losing all my info including the saved memos I had. Luckily I remembered posting it in a Thunderdome thread.
all I am saying is..... the paper that I was shown..... the one that proved me WRONG..... was very specific/detailed, and explained exactly how the clenbuterol detection works
NOT really questioning you..... but do you have a link to WADA stating that there is no better testing procedure than blood/urine for clen?..... would just be interested is all
another thing that I find interesting..... blood testing is better than urine testing, I am absolutely positive of that fact..... Conte/Heredia, everyone has confirmed it.....
and yet, most of the athletes who tested positive over the last couple of years were caught with a standard urine test
maybe the urine testing has gotten better?
The statement I was talking about was posted in a thread here, but I've lost track of it now. I just found another one doe, specifically about Canelo, which mentions hair follicle testing. It can't provide definitive proof one way or the other, but it does give more info than a urine sample:
"The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) concede that they currently have no scientific means to distinguish whether failed drug tests for clenbuterol have resulted from contaminated meat or genuine doping.
They insist, though, that a failure for the steroid in countries considered "high risk" for contamination - notably Mexico and China - is not a "free pass" permitting no further action to be taken.
WADA senior executive director, for sciences and international partnerships, Olivier Rabin, insists that a full investigation must be carried out for every single case.
Hair analysis can also reveal the level and duration of exposure - which is helpful is indicating whether contamination is likely even it does not definitively prove anything.
"We are running some studies to try to distinguish but we don't have a magic solution today," "
I read a funny post on another site... “NSAC appeasing the masses hoping the conversation goes away long enough to push the fight a little better in a week or two/Wilder and Bellew are winding up waiting on them if they back off”.
"Golovkin promoter Tom Loeffler said the suspension is mandated by Nevada regulations until a full hearing has occurred, and the earliest the commission could arrange one is April 10.
"They told us Canelo has complied with follow-up testing and everything they've asked of him, but under their rules, they had to issue a suspension," Loeffler said.
Alvarez is permitted to continue training, and Loeffler said Golovkin "is still training like he's going to fight on May 5, and hopefully, it's against Canelo.""
Wrong, Hector. Below is my card and the thread I posted it in. If you look at that post you'll see that I said I kept it in a memo on my phone. However since then my phone got messed up and I wound up losing all my info including the saved memos I had. Luckily I remembered posting it in a Thunderdome thread.
How the hell do you have 97 winning the sixth and 10 and 11? He was clearly outboxed in the sixth and lost the last 3. Put down your moonshine hillbilly and learn how to score fights.
Comment