Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Camp Standing Firm That Top Rank Contract Expired

[aboutfkntime]

on another (MUCH funnier) note.....

you know the public hanging of that cheating cvnt Canelo..... ?

the public hanging of that cheating cvnt Canelo for injecting HGH into his stomach.....

yea, nah..... that was all just silly bullshht from the muppets

folks are really gullible. This is the picture that people are saying shows Canelo had an injection after the Golovkin weigh in? Someone already posted that this is a birth mark and traces back to all Canelo's fights back to a teenager. Google shows that claim to be true. Here are past pics of Canelo the same freckle or beauty mark back to when he was a teenager dating back to fights in 2010. I don't know how to embed pics but if someone else does here they are.

https://ibb.co/mcRoQH

https://ibb.co/mwRYsx

https://ibb.co/mFEKXx

Not saying Canelo is clean or not but that is not an injection mark it's been on him since a kid. I personally believe this is all manufactured fake news to boost PPV sales anyhow.

lol fkn hilarious

[Eff Pandas]

none of that would be even slightly confusing to a lawyer

Is Manny's guy even legit? Or is this some dipsh^t he's been taking on trips for 5 years all around the world to watch his fight who really digs Judge Judy?

For f#cking sure Manny's contract isn't up. And for sure there are all kinds of bs in there that this cat don't understand that tacks on extra time & insures there is no hard date ever til one day his contract is magically up when x, y & z haven't tacked on extra time.

Bob's been doing this sh^t for like half a decade. His contracts are among the slickest in boxing. He was trying to get Broner to sign a mfing 360 deal like f#cking musicans gotta sign ffs. Bob's contract game is tip top.

if it aint in the contract, it doesn't count..... and if it is in the contract, Pac's lawyer read it

Oh its in there. And I bet its vague & confusing & there is sh^t that makes this other sh^t look like its not real, but its really double real & all sorts of crazy sh^t in there lmfao.

I don't think Bob's taken an L on a contract ever. That Mikey thing still kept Mikey out of the ring for 2yrs or w/e. Others like Floyd & JCC Jr had to buy out there deal. Bob ain't playing with contracts.

[Strategic1]

Bob would be such an @ss if he forces litigation and stalls fights for the 40 yr old legend. The man is 40 yrs old...let him go. lol

[trouser python]

none of that would be even slightly confusing to a lawyer

if it aint in the contract, it doesn't count..... and if it is in the contract, Pac's lawyer read it

Why do you write stuff like this?

You are not only commenting on a field you clearly know nothing about but you are also commenting on a contract that is in no way public knowledge.

Even if not in writing, a verbal agreement is often binding and YOU (and potentially Pac's lawyer) have no idea what has been discussed between Pac, Arum and Koncz.





An oral contract is a contract, the terms of which have been agreed by spoken communication. This is in contrast to a written contract, where the contract is a written document. There may be written, or other physical evidence, of an oral contract – for example where the parties write down what they have agreed – but the contract itself is not a written one.

In general, oral contracts are just as valid as written ones, but some jurisdictions either require a contract to be in writing in certain circumstances (for example where real property is being conveyed), or that a contract be evidenced in writing (although the contract itself may be oral). An example of the latter is the requirement that a contract of guarantee be evidenced in writing, which is found in the Statute of Frauds.

Similarly, the limitation period prescribed for an action may be shorter for an oral contract than it is for a written one.

The term verbal contract is sometimes used as a synonym for oral contract. However, since the term verbal could also mean just using words in addition to using spoken words, the term oral contract should be preferred when maximum clarity is desired. [1]




Texaco vs. Pennzoil case
Samuel Goldwyn said, "An oral contract is as good as the paper it's written on,"[2] but this is often not the case. The vast majority of transactions among individuals and between people and merchant companies are, in fact, the execution of oral contracts.

Oral contracts, when made correctly before witnesses, can be enforced. For example, in 1984, after Getty Oil was sold to Pennzoil in a handshake deal, which is legally binding under New York law, Texaco made a higher offer, and the company was sold to Texaco. (Even though the case was tried in Texas, New York law applied.) Pennzoil filed a lawsuit alleging tortious interference with the oral contract, which the court upheld and awarded $11.1 billion in damages, later reduced to $9.1 billion (but increased again by interest and penalties).[3]




This is just one of potentially many unknown quan****** in this situation.

And don't say that your comment was also referring to an Oral contract because it is clear as day that you meant if it is not in writing it doesn't count, hence Pac's lawyer would have read it.

[ShoulderRoll]

So Arum is the one that keeps those Dubai fights from happening, by threatening to sue the financiers?

[BOLLOCKS]

Damn Arum, you already milked your cash cow dry, let him go.

[Pinoy4ever]

Fight the power and the old man Bob

[megas30]

imho, nope..... the lawyer will be correct

the guy will have done his homework, studied the paperwork, and Manny's contract with Top Rank will have expired

but, Manny will fight a Top Rank opponent

the reason why is this.....

whatever Arum held over Manny that made Pac pull the plug on VisionQuest, is still there..... nothing has changed

this is not about the contract, this is about Manny doing what he is told

reading between the lines..... Pac's lawyer is sure that the contract has expired..... but Arum thinks that..... "Pacquiao is under contract with Top Rank for reasonably long period of time but I don’t know when the contract will expire"

FACT: it is impossible for both of those guys to be correct

and it is beyond bizarre that they could have such a different perception based on Pac's contract

FACT: Arum knows the day, date, and month, that Pac's contract has/will expire..... no question lol

this is typical Arum speak..... he knows that Manny will fight whoever he decides, and he knows that people will only remember him insisting that Pac is still under contract..... the bases are covered

Bob Arum tells you what he wants you to think, I have been watching him for years

Hence why he said Pac is in a contract for a very long time and he doesn't know when it expires. It means as long a Pac keeps fighting he will fight for the Bob father, because whatever he has over him ceases only when he retires.

[Biolink]

He's at least 6-7 years too late on this decision. Wonder how much he would have made without Arum cutting into his pie.

[TrueBox]

Better late than never, I guess