Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: I'm Not Protecting Canelo, But We Have To Be Fair!
Collapse
-
-
How is a positive test a question mark? What world do you live in where you think that isn't enough evidence? This started as how do performance enhancing drugs benefit an athlete. Now your making an argument that he did nothing wrong even with actual proof he took something that's banned?Comment
-
How is a positive test a question mark? What world do you live in where you think that isn't enough evidence? This started as how do performance enhancing drugs benefit an athlete. Now your making an argument that he did nothing wrong even with actual proof he took something that's banned?
he got busted with clen....AND ?!?!?!?!?!?
btw, which are your favorite names in that linkComment
-
Povetkin was one of my favorite fighters before he got popped, still support him but I recognize what he did was wrong and he got treated the way ped cheats should.Comment
-
I'm fighting logic? Your rationalizing things because in your head you don't believe clen can help a fighter.
Povetkin was one of my favorite fighters before he got popped, still support him but I recognize what he did was wrong and he got treated the way ped cheats should.
me~''prove it''Comment
-
Personally I think they are doing the right thing despite the fact that I don't really believe the tainted meat story. I'm not saying it absolutely can't be true, on the evidence he probably would not (or should not) be convicted, it isn't beyond a reasonable doubt he might be innocent.
That said, he is certainly getting off easier than either Povetkin or Ortiz who were also probably guilty, though not beyond a reasonable doubt.Comment
-
-
It takes something that can be even and tips the scales to one side, how can't you see the problem with this? Are you that ignorant on the subject, Or are you just trying to argue for the sake of arguing?Comment
-
Comment
Comment