Tyson of course
Who do you think has more raw power Wilder or Tyson?
Collapse
-
-
I think you're misunderstanding RAW. I'd say Wilder has more raw power... but that's not saying he's a better KO artist. Tyson had serious power, but it was amplified by technique and accuracy. Wilder can miss shots or throw so poorly, and KO people... Tyson landed shots with precision and speed, that gave him his KO ability. So raw Wilder, better KO artist Tyson.Comment
-
I knew id see a post like this lol if wilder had Tysons resume u all would be saying he fought bums and old fighters who were over the hill. they both have serious power Tyson knock outs were better because of his technique they both have serious power please stop itTyson knocked out guys who had proven chins , Tysons body shots are by far harder than any punch Wilder can throw .
Wilder really is more like Cooney power but Tysons punches shook your entire body and energy . His punches were more compact and i cant see any opponent that Wilder fought lasting longer with the same amount of punches if Tyson landed on them.Last edited by uppercut510; 03-14-2018, 09:32 AM.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
This is perfectly said and perfectly defines the differences.I think you're misunderstanding RAW. I'd say Wilder has more raw power... but that's not saying he's a better KO artist. Tyson had serious power, but it was amplified by technique and accuracy. Wilder can miss shots or throw so poorly, and KO people... Tyson landed shots with precision and speed, that gave him his KO ability. So raw Wilder, better KO artist Tyson.Comment
-
It was Leon Spinks who had no teeth at the front.
Tyson fought Micheal Spinks not Leon.Comment
-
thx for the correction, they would complain spinks was a cruiser weight and holmes was past his prime, if they are complaining about Ortiz being old u know they would complain about holmes going on 40. Tyson is one of my favs but lets be honest his resume was full of mediocre opponents as wellComment
Comment