Who do you think has more raw power Wilder or Tyson?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • juggernaut666
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2015
    • 15544
    • 1,226
    • 500
    • 87,472

    #41
    Originally posted by uppercut510
    I watched boxing in the 80s, ive been to a mike Tyson fight. have you? I said Tysons kos are better because of technique and they both have power out of this world its really no way to say who is more powerful. My point was that, to act like Tyson fought all these HW monsters with proven chins is going too far, he fought a bunch of what u all would call bums in these times.
    Technique ADDS to power .

    Once again you have only reinforced my stance .

    Who has Wilder fought again if we are using YOUR criteria to determine hardest hitter ?



    The hard truth is any boxing knowledgeable fan is not going to pick Wilder based on his career so far against a technical ,fast and stylistically hook puncher like M.Tyson .

    If you dont like the fact that a more logical view suggests Tyson hits harder ,why are you even on the thread if Tyson IS the topic only to complain about who hes fought ?

    Did Larry give you a bad batch ,heard thats going around ?..lol
    Last edited by juggernaut666; 03-14-2018, 12:36 PM.

    Comment

    • Jsmooth9876
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2014
      • 12209
      • 2,297
      • 365
      • 72,745

      #42
      Tyson had power in both hands and could knock you out with a hook, uppercut, body shot and whatever else he landed. Wilder hits you with a Haymaker then throws 30 more haymakers to follow it up. He's a bum with amazing power. Tyson had better all around power and could deliver it in many more ways.

      Comment

      • Boksfan
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2017
        • 9185
        • 277
        • 355
        • 66,176

        #43
        Originally posted by larryxxx..
        Holmes was old and flabby and Spinks was a former light heavyweight
        I'm sorry now I can see you actually are an idiot.

        Comment

        • Larry the boss
          EDUCATED
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 90798
          • 6,419
          • 4,473
          • 2,500,480

          #44
          Originally posted by Boksfan
          I'm sorry now I can see you actually are an idiot.
          Was Holmes not old and flabby??? was Spinks not a career light heavy weight with only 5 heavyweight fights?

          Comment

          • uppercut510
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2016
            • 7071
            • 430
            • 210
            • 51,945

            #45
            Originally posted by larryxxx..
            A former light heavy weight?
            LOL if wilder had Tysons resume they would call them all bums and say holmes was old n spinks was a cruiser weight.

            Comment

            • Boksfan
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2017
              • 9185
              • 277
              • 355
              • 66,176

              #46
              Originally posted by larryxxx..
              Was Holmes not old and flabby??? was Spinks not a career light heavy weight with only 5 heavyweight fights?
              Yes, second best heavyweight champion in history was fat and old at the age of 38 but Luis Ortiz was slim and in his prime at the age of 39. You ******ed Wilder nuthuggers are all pathetic

              Comment

              • uppercut510
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2016
                • 7071
                • 430
                • 210
                • 51,945

                #47
                Originally posted by juggernaut666
                Technique ADDS to power .

                Once again you have only reinforced my stance .

                Who has Wilder fought again if we are using YOUR criteria to determine hardest hitter ?



                The hard truth is any boxing knowledgeable fan is not going to pick Wilder based on his career so far against a technical ,fast and stylistically hook puncher like M.Tyson .

                If you dont like the fact that a more logical view suggests Tyson hits harder ,why are you even on the thread if Tyson IS the topic only to complain about who hes fought ?

                Did Larry give you a bad batch ,heard thats going around ?..lol
                lol ok man u win lolol the bad batch got me

                Comment

                • uppercut510
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2016
                  • 7071
                  • 430
                  • 210
                  • 51,945

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Boksfan
                  Yes, second best heavyweight champion in history was fat and old at the age of 38 but Luis Ortiz was slim and in his prime at the age of 39. You ******ed Wilder nuthuggers are all pathetic
                  nobody is insinuating Ortiz is better than holmes or even comparing them, holmes was past it but was still a decent fight and win for Tyson. but to act like Tyson fought all these top HWs is an overstatement, u guys are too much its not even worth a debate

                  Comment

                  • Boksfan
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2017
                    • 9185
                    • 277
                    • 355
                    • 66,176

                    #49
                    Originally posted by uppercut510
                    nobody is insinuating Ortiz is better than holmes or even comparing them, holmes was past it but was still a decent fight and win for Tyson. but to act like Tyson fought all these top HWs is an overstatement, u guys are too much its not even worth a debate
                    Wilder nuthugger like you actually admits that Tyson is better? What the hell happened here.

                    Comment

                    • uppercut510
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2016
                      • 7071
                      • 430
                      • 210
                      • 51,945

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Boksfan
                      Wilder nuthugger like you actually admits that Tyson is better? What the hell happened here.
                      please spare me the h0 mo talk im a boxing fan not a nut hugger, I actually am an AJ fan as well. and hell yes Tyson was better than wilder I prefer Tysons style over Wilders but Tysons resume is a bit overhyped.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP