This is so ****** its not even worth debating whether canelo took/takes PED's!!!
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
and you dont think pressure can be put on WADA to clear the results? As i asked the other guy, what other results get released with a disclaimer and a ready made excuse? if i failed a test at school i didnt get a disclaimer by it, you get the score and thats it.Comment
-
WADA oversee 100s of sports with millions of athletes. You think they would risk their credibility for Canelo?
Comment
-
it makes perfect sense. Moneys on the line here, millions and millions down the toilet for GBP if their only money maker gets busted. If you dont think theres corruption in boxing then you havent been following it very long. They could easily pressure him or throw him some money to say that. As i keep saying, dont you think its odd the way it was released? ive never known anything like it, what ****ing organisation releases results with an excuse for the fighter. its for the fighter to come up with the excuse lol.Comment
-
a lot of people would sell their daughters into sex slavery for the right price. women allowed their kids to stay over Michael jacksons house overnight KNOWING what he would do then got multi million dollar payoffs. are you that dumb?Comment
-
So you think Canelo can pay them more than they receive overseeing almost every sport and millions of athletes.
If they can be bought why isn't UFC doing it when their big named athletes get popped?
Comment
-
lol. Then I assume that someone can throw him some money to claim that Canelo failed when he really didn't, huh? How ridiculous would it be if I said someone passed the lab money to say he failed when he didn't.it makes perfect sense. Moneys on the line here, millions and millions down the toilet for GBP if their only money maker gets busted. If you dont think theres corruption in boxing then you havent been following it very long. They could easily pressure him or throw him some money to say that. As i keep saying, dont you think its odd the way it was released? ive never known anything like it, what ****ing organisation releases results with an excuse for the fighter. its for the fighter to come up with the excuse lol.
Come on, dude. I knew you would go with "they threw some money at the WADA scientist bs." That's the only place you had to go. The scientist put the info. out there that this is consistent with what's expected of meat contamination. That can be verified by other scientists! Whether he was paid off or not, that is a FACT.
Now when I ask you to prove he was paid off.....
Nothing. Too bad they couldn't have threw some money at him to somehow keep it completely quiet, huh?Last edited by travestyny; 03-08-2018, 02:29 PM.Comment
-
i cant prove it, of course i cant but its damn su****ious. a guy fails a test, and immediately alongside the announcement (from a supposedly objective source) theres a ready made excuse, immediately the sanctioning bodies defend canelo. Does this ever happen with lower profile fighters? I cant prove them consistently bad judges involved in canelo fights have been paid off but it damn looks su****ious too. These organisations are meant to deliver the result not come out with some bull**** that its in the range tainted meat. How the **** do they know its tainted meat? They dont and its not there place to say it. Theres not a 'tainted meat' category on these tests ffs lol, its quite conceivable that he could be at the end of a course of clenbuterol thats still in the system. Just cause its low doesnt mean its automatically meat or why the ****s it considered a positive result in the first place? They are meant to be completely objective thats my point. Its fishy as hell and i cant be the only one who thinks that. And to barratt too, they havent risked millions because theyve delivered the result ultimately but have been paid/pressured to put a spin on it.lol. Then I assume that someone can throw him some money to claim that Canelo failed when he really didn't, huh? How ridiculous would it be if I said someone passed the lab money to say he failed when he didn't.
Come on, dude. I knew you would go with "they threw some money at the WADA scientist bs." That's the only place you had to go. The scientist put the info. out there that this is consistent with what's expected of meat contamination. That can be verified by other scientists! Whether he was paid off or not, that is a FACT.
Now when I ask you to prove he was paid off.....
Nothing. Too bad they couldn't have threw some money at him to somehow keep it completely quiet, huh?Comment
Comment