41 years old Klitschko vs 38 years old Ortiz - who is a better fighter?
Collapse
-
Solis beat Ortiz five times in the amateursComment
-
Prove me wrong. Jenning's only loss was a competitive fight with the #1 guy in the division, Klitschko. Pulev, Pedvetkin, Haye didn't do anywhere near as good as Jennings did vs Klitschko and it's because they weren't as good. Very simple.Comment
-
Comment
-
Wlad has consistently shown defensive flaws throughout his career, that's the difference, as a pro Ortiz has been practically flawless. It took him years to master his holding and even when he did he was still getting exposed.
In 2012 Wlad was still getting rocked by a guy like Wach, saved by the bell by a guy with a 50% KO ratio. Jennings lit up his body, Fury completely picked him apart, AJ annihilated him despite being just 3 years pro.Comment
-
they were both pretty good wins, wlad was coming off a loss and a layoff but his name makes him the better win, ortiz is very good u goaat give props to wilder. but we cant ignore that wlad has lost to lesser fighters b4 as wellComment
-
So did Ali and Foreman. Are we going to say that Ortiz could beat them also?Comment
-
Klitschko was the better fighter overall and had a better career but by the time he was 40 he was shot. Fury dominated him and then he had a year of inactivity before he was fed to Joshua.
Ortiz started his career late and did not have much wear and tear on his body.Comment
-
Haha, do a poll on Ortiz gassing as well. Ortiz didn't do anything for 6 rounds, but after a flurry of punches he's finished.
I know you want Wilder to get full credit and all, but you shouldn't attempt to lie to yourself.
Go on, do a poll for both and find out the answer. You know you'll lose it.Comment
Comment