Originally posted by Dirt E Gomez
As far as idealism goes, there used to be a line that says, "Idealism like youth is sorely wasted on the young."
I'm glad somebody has pointed out that in my advanced age, having travelled far and wide, having watched so much pain and suffering along with a few unforgettable instances of triumph, having won some and lost some myself, I have not lost much of what I used to have. Naivete and idealism at 55. Though they're not one and the same, they're clearly something I like having.
Here's hoping that you're accurate in your observations. Thank you.
In the meantime, a couple of minor questions: Isn't the law founded on idealism? Aren't guarantees of rights embedded in laws codifications of ideas of Freedom and Human Rights? Or is thinking them to be so naive?
Why go to courts then if by doing so, one shall only deal with expressions of ideals and naivete? Why don't boxers--professed fighters as they are- settle their differences in the time-honored fashion that extra-judicial settlements were done in centuries past just so they won't have anything to do with matters that have some touch of idealism?
Speaking of "perfect world", I spoke not of one but of a world in the past which was far from perfect. I called it, "simpler times."
Comment