Women have no business judging men's fights, especially a proven incompetent twat like her.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: NSAC Head: We're Moving Forward With Adalaide Byrd
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View PostI think what I'm getting at is that maybe we're just damn well overcomplicating things... if you saw a streetfight you'd know who won 99 times out of a 100... you shouldn't need some kind of specialist training to know who wins a fight and if you do... well what I'm contending is that maybe there's something wrong with the rules themselves if a layman can't figure out who won. The idea of crowd or newspaper acclamation is as old as the sport itself, and honestly I think you do the common fan a disservice by claiming they're too ****** and/or biased to know what's going on. If anything it's often us obsessives whose judgement may be clouded by an endless repetition of the same tired arguments and entrenched positions...
Anyway. Food for thought, man.
Who you got tonight in the WBSS?
fair point
the problem is..... fighters have mastered instincts, that casual fans do not know even exist..... I absolutely know that many casual-fans do not know what is REALLY happening as they watch a fight unfold
a higher degree of knowledge is required, and a high degree of training..... which is why I would prefer that ex-fighters fill that role
just one example..... very few casual-fans even acknowledge defence, let alone factor it in as scoring criteria
my suggestion is..... keep the casuals as far away from anything important as-is humanly possible..... because experience is the key to EVERYTHING in life, including boxing
would you let casuals give you business advice ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Loma#1 View PostWhat I said was that if Triple Gee moved like Linares or Vassily, then people could make a case that he got robbed. A lot of punches that Triple Gee threw were jabs and many of those that looked “connected” were his jabs pushing Canelo’s guard over his face. I recall Triple Gee had about 3 hard jabs a round, clean, where Bummelo’s head snapped back. Other than that Triple Gee had a horrid performance or he got payed to fight that way. Vassil can do combos or fakes that would tag Bummelo all night. This is why I do not like when Triple Gee fans act like they are Lomachenko fans.
You see the point? You work with what you got. Triple g is no Loma so quit comparing them.
And for you to even say that Triple g got paid to fight a certain way is pure ******ity! You really don't know shet about boxing if you really believe that!
Comment
-
koba.....
just one example.....
Mayweather/Maidana
many casuals think that the welterweight kingpin Maidana beat Mayweather in the first fight
they think/said that Maidana pressured Floyd, and Floyd's pipes burst because his legs were shot (many piggy-backed off those silly/naive comments by Freddie Roach)
this is what really happened
Maidana was a ridiculous cherry-pick..... he was a hand-picked, look-good, opponent..... specifically designed to be Floyd's "Gatti-at-147"..... and he was only justified (weakly imho) because of his win over Broner
and the ONLY reason why Maidana had any success, is because Floyd fought him-flat-footed..... like he fought Cotto/McGregor/Gatti
we all saw what happened in the rematch when Floyd boxed Maidana on his toes
Maidana had just been schooled by Devon fkn Alexander..... he was an undeserving cherry-pick who Floyd viewed as an unskilled punching bag
in saying that, I was extremely happy for Chino, he bought the business and fought much better than expected..... but listening to casual-fans discuss that fight as they proclaimed Maidana the new welterweight kingpin was pretty amusing
casual-fans see what they want to see, which would be awful for boxing
most casuals do not know what they saw in that fight, which is why Maidana got more credit than he deserved
maybe not the best example, but a good example nonetheless
Comment
-
Originally posted by BigStomps View PostAnd if you was able to please your woman then she wouldn't have to be calling up other guys to satisfy her cause you obviously can't!
You see the point? You work with what you got. Triple g is no Loma so quit comparing them.
And for you to even say that Triple g got paid to fight a certain way is pure ******ity! You really don't know shet about boxing if you really believe that!
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostByrd is not corrupt
if so, she simply would not have scored so widely for Canelo
the difference between Byrd..... and the other two judges, who differed by 1 solitary point..... is a slight change in perception..... that is all
that is why Byrd has been retained
some of those middle rounds were very close
she scored for Canelo, because she could not find a reason not to..... not all of that blame should go to Byrd, and none of it should go to Canelo
Ask yourself if you would want her to judge your bout with that mentality. She might score every round for your opponent by way of not finding a reason not to.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SAINTSTEVE View PostIf Canelo was her default choice for every round that was close then that explains how her card failed to represent reality. I would have preferred it 10-2 for GGG but that is still a stretch OK.
Ask yourself if you would want her to judge your bout with that mentality. She might score every round for your opponent by way of not finding a reason not to.
I absolutely do want her to score every bout with that mentality
I just want her to watch both guys next time
Byrd is not alone using that rationale..... in a matchup with a pressure-fighter vs a boxer, old school judges understand hit-and-not-get-hit..... which is exactly how a fight should be scored..... so unless the pressure fighter is being effective, then he is being outboxed
what else could prevent a pressure-fighter from being effective?
her scorecard was too wide, it was outside the range of reasonable scores..... but the range of reasonable scores was much wider than most realize..... largely due to Golovkin's ineffectiveness/inaccuracy, but also due to Canelo's lethargy
in saying that, I would not be too upset if Golovkin had gotten the nod in that fight..... nor would I be upset had Canelo gotten the nod..... but yea, Golovkin can consider himself a little hard-done-by considering Byrd's score..... but not considering the other two judges who scored a draw and a win for GGG by 1 solitary point
I have heard 118-110 scores for Golovkin, from fans..... and nothing like that happenedLast edited by aboutfkntime; 02-03-2018, 04:09 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postfair point
the problem is..... fighters have mastered instincts, that casual fans do not know even exist..... I absolutely know that many casual-fans do not know what is REALLY happening as they watch a fight unfold
a higher degree of knowledge is required, and a high degree of training..... which is why I would prefer that ex-fighters fill that role
just one example..... very few casual-fans even acknowledge defence, let alone factor it in as scoring criteria
my suggestion is..... keep the casuals as far away from anything important as-is humanly possible..... because experience is the key to EVERYTHING in life, including boxing
would you let casuals give you business advice ?
But yeah... if my business was the providing of a populist entertainment for the masses, I may not take their advice with my business planning but I'd surely do my best to give them want they wanted... and would certainly try to avoid alienating them by telling telling them, essentially, that they're too ****** to understand the entertainment I'm offering them. And yeah... if I could involve them in some way to increase their enjoyment and level of participation so they'd come back for more? Sure... I'd probably do that too...
And man... you don't always have to appreciate the beautiful subtleties and intricacies of defense to see which guy is getting hit more and which guy is getting hit less - (which is, after all, the entire point of the exercise) now, do ya?
Comment
-
Comment