My Pound For Pound Rankings

[Easy-E]

Mike Tyson was in the Pound for Pound list in 1988

He was on the Ring P4P List???

Id hope not, unless the Ring realized what they had done shortly after and never put a HW on their again.

[Run]

I thought so too, hence the "lost" but he still techniclly recived the L, so its tough for me personally to put him up there.

Pound for Pound rankings are subjective.

It's not about accomplishment all the time, it's about who would beat someone else.

As far as I'm concerned.....Raheem could beat anyone in boxing at his weight. If that's what we're going on.....then he'd be much higher on my list.

He's simply too difficult a fighter to face....to slick, and will use different tactics to win the fight.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[JuicyJuice]

He was on the Ring P4P List???

Id hope not, unless the Ring realized what they had done shortly after and never put a HW on their again.

Tyson was #1 lb4lb in 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989 and going into 1990.

And what the HELL are you talking about with that **** that HW's shouldn't be in lb4lb lists?? Lol, I don't know where your coming from dude.

[Easy-E]

Pound for Pound rankings are subjective.

It's not about accomplishment all the time, it's about who would beat someone else.

As far as I'm concerned.....Raheem could beat anyone in boxing at his weight. If that's what we're going on.....then he'd be much higher on my list.

He's simply too difficult a fighter to face....to slick, and will use different tactics to win the fight.

Which is why i said i personally couldnt put him on my list.

[Parody]

He was on the Ring P4P List???

Id hope not, unless the Ring realized what they had done shortly after and never put a HW on their again.

in 1988 tyson was ranked p4p #1 by ring magazine...

[TheGreat1]

Why is it that no one ever includes the HW's Toney should be on this list. Hell he started at Middleweight, thats P4p, he showed he can fight at any weight

[Easy-E]

in 1988 tyson was ranked p4p #1 by ring magazine...

Apparently, they are retarted and dont know why the pound for pound system was originated then.

[JuicyJuice]

Why is it that no one ever includes the HW's Toney should be on this list. Hell he started at Middleweight, thats P4p, he showed he can fight at any weight

Toney fought at middleweight 14 years ago, lb4lb lists are based on recent form

I suppose if Hagler made a comeback, he'd automatically be lb4lb #1 again, would he?

[Easy-E]

Why is it that no one ever includes the HW's Toney should be on this list. Hell he started at Middleweight, thats P4p, he showed he can fight at any weight

He is an all time p4p'er, but right now, seeing as he is a middleweight, he should not be on the p4p list.
That is not why it was originated.

[Parody]

Apparently, they are retarted and dont know why the pound for pound system was originated then.

Hmmm...Ring magazine is legit man