My Pound For Pound Rankings

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MIKEYTWOFIVE
    Up and Comer
    • Jan 2006
    • 80
    • 9
    • 1
    • 6,317

    #61
    Originally posted by The_Bringer
    Why does everybody seem to place Castillo above Corrales on their pound-for-pound rankings? They're 1-1 and the fact that Castillo didn't make weight reflects badly upon him as a fighter.
    Castillo knocked his ass out, and you are only as good as your last fight and all that. . .

    Comment

    • SecondRoundKO
      Up and Comer
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Oct 2005
      • 89
      • 9
      • 7
      • 6,342

      #62
      Originally posted by PBF34
      Surley you mean post cruiser weight...
      No I really don't. He beat a 40 year old MaCullum and Jirov. That's about it. Jirov is fairly impressive but it won't blow anyone out of the water. He was champion but the division was paper thin.

      Comment

      • MIKEYTWOFIVE
        Up and Comer
        • Jan 2006
        • 80
        • 9
        • 1
        • 6,317

        #63
        Originally posted by JuicyJuice
        I don't see how Hatton can be in the lb4lb ratings based on his last fight, isn't this supposed to be on current form??
        He's won three world title fights in a row at two different weights, beat undisputed king of the best division in boxing ( at that time ) just one year ago, unified the title against a difficult guy then moved up and beat a southpaw in the states

        Comment

        • Easy-E
          Gotta want it
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 22686
          • 865
          • 1,739
          • 32,777

          #64
          Originally posted by SecondRoundKO
          No I really don't. He beat a 40 year old MaCullum and Jirov. That's about it. Jirov is fairly impressive but it won't blow anyone out of the water. He was champion but the division was paper thin.
          Jirov was an excellent cruiserweight. The pre-fight buildup around that fight was INTENSE. It lived up to its name.
          Ill agree that his record at HW is laughable at best.

          Comment

          • SecondRoundKO
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Oct 2005
            • 89
            • 9
            • 7
            • 6,342

            #65
            Originally posted by PBF34
            Jirov was an excellent cruiserweight. The pre-fight buildup around that fight was INTENSE. It lived up to its name.
            Ill agree that his record at HW is laughable at best.
            I remember the fight Still, that 1 victory doesn't justify the 2 years of doing nothing.

            Comment

            • MIKEYTWOFIVE
              Up and Comer
              • Jan 2006
              • 80
              • 9
              • 1
              • 6,317

              #66
              Originally posted by PBF34
              Chris Eubank is the greatest fighter of all time.
              Pleeeease tellme your joking! ! What the heck makes u say that? ? Eubank was an absolute joke, he lost more fights than he won but the WBO kept giving him gifts decisions because they knew they wouldn't exist without him. .

              Guy was a disgrace to the sport, he pushed boxing to the gutter.
              Last edited by MIKEYTWOFIVE; 06-13-2006, 01:36 PM.

              Comment

              • Run
                Outlaw
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2005
                • 56188
                • 2,588
                • 4,569
                • 76,412

                #67
                Originally posted by MIKEYTWOFIVE
                1 : Pacquiao
                2 : Calzaghe
                3 : Mayweather
                4 : Wladimir
                5 : Castillo
                6 : Hopkins
                7 : Taylor
                8 : Hatton
                9 : Winky
                10 : Barerra
                Even if I don't agree with your list.

                You can't have Wladimir Klitschko on a P4P list. He's the best Heavyweight, and that's not how this scale works.

                Because if you actually think Wlad would beat a 6'6 Floyd Mayweather Jr with all the same skills and speed etc:

                You're crazy.



                Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

                Comment

                • MIKEYTWOFIVE
                  Up and Comer
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 80
                  • 9
                  • 1
                  • 6,317

                  #68
                  Originally posted by SecondRoundKO
                  No I really don't. He beat a 40 year old MaCullum and Jirov. That's about it. Jirov is fairly impressive but it won't blow anyone out of the water. He was champion but the division was paper thin.
                  Jirov was real good pre Toney, watch a highlight reel or something

                  Comment

                  • MIKEYTWOFIVE
                    Up and Comer
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 80
                    • 9
                    • 1
                    • 6,317

                    #69
                    Originally posted by RunWithKnives
                    Even if I don't agree with your list.

                    You can't have Wladimir Klitschko on a P4P list. He's the best Heavyweight, and that's not how this scale works.

                    Because if you actually think Wlad would beat a 6'6 Floyd Mayweather Jr with all the same skills and speed etc:

                    You're crazy.
                    Wladimir has schooled Sam Peter and Chris Byrd in his last couple fights dude, this is POUND FOR POUND afterall so heavies should have same consideration, otherwise it would be all minimumweights

                    Comment

                    • Run
                      Outlaw
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 56188
                      • 2,588
                      • 4,569
                      • 76,412

                      #70
                      Originally posted by MIKEYTWOFIVE
                      Wladimir has schooled Sam Peter and Chris Byrd in his last couple fights dude, this POUND FOR POUND afterall so heavies should have same consideration, otherwise it would be all minimumweights
                      That's a good point.

                      But the scale doesn't relate to heavyweights.

                      They're the supreme weight and if considered for P4P lists their size would create some sort of bias.

                      Because Klitschko is huge. These other guys are little guys, and if you would say: Wladimir Klitschko would beat Oscar De La Hoya in a fight, more than likely you'd be correct.



                      Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP