Originally posted by The_Bringer
My Pound For Pound Rankings
Collapse
-
-
No I really don't. He beat a 40 year old MaCullum and Jirov. That's about it. Jirov is fairly impressive but it won't blow anyone out of the water. He was champion but the division was paper thin.Originally posted by PBF34Surley you mean post cruiser weight...Comment
-
He's won three world title fights in a row at two different weights, beat undisputed king of the best division in boxing ( at that time ) just one year ago, unified the title against a difficult guy then moved up and beat a southpaw in the statesOriginally posted by JuicyJuiceI don't see how Hatton can be in the lb4lb ratings based on his last fight, isn't this supposed to be on current form??Comment
-
Jirov was an excellent cruiserweight. The pre-fight buildup around that fight was INTENSE. It lived up to its name.Originally posted by SecondRoundKONo I really don't. He beat a 40 year old MaCullum and Jirov. That's about it. Jirov is fairly impressive but it won't blow anyone out of the water. He was champion but the division was paper thin.
Ill agree that his record at HW is laughable at best.Comment
-
I remember the fightOriginally posted by PBF34Jirov was an excellent cruiserweight. The pre-fight buildup around that fight was INTENSE. It lived up to its name.
Ill agree that his record at HW is laughable at best.
Still, that 1 victory doesn't justify the 2 years of doing nothing.
Comment
-
Pleeeease tellme your joking! ! What the heck makes u say that? ? Eubank was an absolute joke, he lost more fights than he won but the WBO kept giving him gifts decisions because they knew they wouldn't exist without him. .Originally posted by PBF34Chris Eubank is the greatest fighter of all time.
Guy was a disgrace to the sport, he pushed boxing to the gutter.Last edited by MIKEYTWOFIVE; 06-13-2006, 01:36 PM.Comment
-
Even if I don't agree with your list.Originally posted by MIKEYTWOFIVE1 : Pacquiao
2 : Calzaghe
3 : Mayweather
4 : Wladimir
5 : Castillo
6 : Hopkins
7 : Taylor
8 : Hatton
9 : Winky
10 : Barerra
You can't have Wladimir Klitschko on a P4P list. He's the best Heavyweight, and that's not how this scale works.
Because if you actually think Wlad would beat a 6'6 Floyd Mayweather Jr with all the same skills and speed etc:
You're crazy.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!Comment
-
Jirov was real good pre Toney, watch a highlight reel or somethingOriginally posted by SecondRoundKONo I really don't. He beat a 40 year old MaCullum and Jirov. That's about it. Jirov is fairly impressive but it won't blow anyone out of the water. He was champion but the division was paper thin.Comment
-
Wladimir has schooled Sam Peter and Chris Byrd in his last couple fights dude, this is POUND FOR POUND afterall so heavies should have same consideration, otherwise it would be all minimumweightsOriginally posted by RunWithKnivesEven if I don't agree with your list.
You can't have Wladimir Klitschko on a P4P list. He's the best Heavyweight, and that's not how this scale works.
Because if you actually think Wlad would beat a 6'6 Floyd Mayweather Jr with all the same skills and speed etc:
You're crazy.Comment
-
That's a good point.Originally posted by MIKEYTWOFIVEWladimir has schooled Sam Peter and Chris Byrd in his last couple fights dude, this POUND FOR POUND afterall so heavies should have same consideration, otherwise it would be all minimumweights
But the scale doesn't relate to heavyweights.
They're the supreme weight and if considered for P4P lists their size would create some sort of bias.
Because Klitschko is huge. These other guys are little guys, and if you would say: Wladimir Klitschko would beat Oscar De La Hoya in a fight, more than likely you'd be correct.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!Comment
Comment