Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Crawford: I Don't Rate Lomachenko as P4P 1 or Fighter of The Year!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
    Damn Crawford is salty.

    If he wants the p4p title go and beat Thurman and Spence.

    But if Loma beats Garcia, you could lose it again.
    Complete rubbish, and the exact mindset he's complaining about.

    You mean to tell me, he beats Thurman and Spence, unifies his second division in the process, Lomachenko only has to beat Mikey to be p4p #1 in your book?

    No way in hell.....

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by HI-TECH Boxing View Post
      Crawford is mad because deep down he knows that Loma is better than him.
      Poor Crawford.

      Remember when Crawford got fighter of the year for beating small Gamboa?
      Bigger size difference in that fight than Loma-Rigo. People praised that win like crazy. Oh it's the fight of the year. You guys remember that? Crawford is amazing!!!
      He also beat Beltran that year. You know that Beltran that people don't want to see Loma face, but it was perfectly fine for Bud to face him. Bud even got fighter of the year off that win and small Gamboa. Inactive too.

      If Loma beats Beltran, Linares, and some else he may get fighter of the year again this year. It's way too early for that.
      Bud is about to have another bad year, because he can't face any of the other top Welterweights.
      And Spence will only get better from here.
      Bud is about to fight Horn and Alvarado. Great year bud. Let's see him complain once he doesn't get fighter of the year for 2018.

      Somebody give Crawford a cookie. Maybe it'll make him feel better.
      Actually Crawford beat Burns in addition to Beltran and Gamboa. Burns and Beltran were considered the best at 135 besides Crawford. He deserved to win Foty that year. I also think Loma deserved it last year. 3 wins against top opponents, 1 of which was rigo despite the size difference. Made all 3 quit and I think that was the difference because he was so dominant. Should be another close Foty race between Loma and Crawford this year too. There are a handful of top ww Crawford can fight this year

      Comment


      • #43
        Crawfart had 2 mediocre wins last year and thinks he is better than Loma. come on bruh, dont surround yourself with ******s.

        Comment


        • #44
          [QUOTE=Butch.McRae;18454022]This write up doesn't cover all of what he said. There's a video on DBN. It wasn't salty. He was just comparing their wins last year.

          He was telling the truth. He did face better comp.[/QUOTEcrawford is being salty about it he's been crying about it on social media as well. rigo is a better win than any of crawford's wins.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by FLY TY View Post
            Complete rubbish, and the exact mindset he's complaining about.

            You mean to tell me, he beats Thurman and Spence, unifies his second division in the process, Lomachenko only has to beat Mikey to be p4p #1 in your book?

            No way in hell.....
            So Linares and Easter and unify that division, certainly will do that.


            Either way, Crawford should not be *****ing about a popularity contest. Act like a man

            Comment


            • #46
              Crawford's year was historic. Ask GGG how hard it is to unify and entire division. It hasn't been done since Hopkins did it a decade ago. I like Lomachenko, but he may never unify all belts in a weight class. It's far easier going from weight class to weight class collecting belts than it is to take them all in a single weight class. It's just the truth.

              Comment


              • #47
                lol crawford is still bitching about this???

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by wrecksracer View Post
                  Crawford's year was historic. Ask GGG how hard it is to unify and entire division.
                  All it took was to beat nobody by the name Indongo. That's it.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by wrecksracer View Post
                    Crawford's year was historic. Ask GGG how hard it is to unify and entire division. It hasn't been done since Hopkins did it a decade ago. I like Lomachenko, but he may never unify all belts in a weight class. It's far easier going from weight class to weight class collecting belts than it is to take them all in a single weight class. It's just the truth.
                    140 was a weak division lets be honest.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      LOMO is no. 5 or 6 on my list.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP