Excuses for when golovkin loses thread

[Shape up]

I'd like to see a link to it also because I don't recall seeing that. I think he made that up also..

I've never heard that before, 300+ amateurs and all of his pro fights yet he is a young 33, he has rocks in his head

[Cutthroat]

So becoming a smarter fighter means prime? Clear YOU don't understand the difference between what prime is and what knowledge means. Prime and experience have nothing to do with each other in terms of physical peaks. What good is it to learn to throw a curve ball or a jab when you arm isn't as strong or when you can only throw ten of them before you have to stop? So if I hired Sanchez when i'm 50 and he teaches me the proper way to throw a hook that means I am suddenly in my prime?

Sanchez corrected ggg's balance, jab, inside fighting, distance management etc. There is a BIG difference between pre-Sanchez ggg and post Sanchez ggg.

Physical prime doesn't=Prime as a fighter

It doesn't matter how much of a bad ass you are, if you don't box intelligently you will lose.

Wlad & Lewis were both 6'6 240lb destroyers at one point, it got them losses to journeymen before they hired Steward. ggg was on that same path, he got rocked for the first time in his career 2008 and knew he would not last long at the top of the division.

and 35 isn't 50.

[Cutthroat]

So you are struggling if you are ahead on all scorecards?

If you're up like 2 rounds, yes.

Ouma was done as a fighter, 2-5 in his last 7 fights, that is bad if you're not blowing this guy out.

[Chuckguy]

He is too fat and old

[Tutsa]

I wish Canelo would step on the scale before entering the ring for the rematch .. would love to see the difference between him and GGG .. if I had to guess I would save he comes in at 180 but will never know cause question about how he cuts and adds it back on in 24 hours !!

[Tutsa]

If you're up like 2 rounds, yes.

Ouma was done as a fighter, 2-5 in his last 7 fights, that is bad if you're not blowing this guy out.

That right hand by Ward us so perfectly timed with great precision and looks quick in slow motion to .. This is were fans don't give credit to Dre about his Boxing skill s , it's of topic but can't ignore it .. good stuff man

[Chuckguy]

Sanchez corrected ggg's balance, jab, inside fighting, distance management etc. There is a BIG difference between pre-Sanchez ggg and post Sanchez ggg.

Physical prime doesn't=Prime as a fighter

It doesn't matter how much of a bad ass you are, if you don't box intelligently you will lose.

Wlad & Lewis were both 6'6 240lb destroyers at one point, it got them losses to journeymen before they hired Steward. ggg was on that same path, he got rocked for the first time in his career 2008 and knew he would not last long at the top of the division.

and 35 isn't 50.

I agree
Kobe was prime at 37
Not in his late 20’s when he was dominating

[stealthradon]

If you're up like 2 rounds, yes.

Ouma was done as a fighter, 2-5 in his last 7 fights, that is bad if you're not blowing this guy out.

So when Bundrage won against Ouma, by a margin of 96-93 96-93 95-94 he also struggled?

[Curt Henning]

3 or 4 years you say but your join date is 2017, doesn't add up I must say, as I've said, I have never heard anyone say he's a young 33. He likes to fight so you will always take some damage, the ouma fight for instance but eh, believe what you want, lots of people talk themselves into believing something is true

ive been around other boards...also had another name here but forgot the password and didnt use the email address anymore so i couldnt recover it

its been said many times across several boxing boards...and here specifically....if you havent seen it you arent here enough or are choosing not to see it

i can remember several instances specifically in which i was involved in the convo...and a golovkin fan would reference hopkins MW resume and compare and say "hopkins MW resume isnt much either yet hes considered a legend"...to which i explained "hopkins wouldnt be a legend on his MW resume alone...if he stopped there his resume would be torn apart and he wouldnt be some legendary boxing figure...bernard is a legend because of his resume after his MW reign"

and golovkin fans would reply "well we have to wait and see...golovkin is a young 33 and hasnt taken any real damage...he should have many years left in the sport....before we bash his resume lets give him time...who knows he could go to 168 and 175 too..his trainer says he can" and garbage like that...now they are singing a different tune completely

[Shape up]

ive been around other boards...also had another name here but forgot the password and didnt use the email address anymore so i couldnt recover it

its been said many times across several boxing boards...and here specifically....if you havent seen it you arent here enough or are choosing not to see it

i can remember several instances specifically in which i was involved in the convo...and a golovkin fan would reference hopkins MW resume and compare and say "hopkins MW resume isnt much either yet hes considered a legend"...to which i explained "hopkins wouldnt be a legend on his MW resume alone...if he stopped there his resume would be torn apart and he wouldnt be some legendary boxing figure...bernard is a legend because of his resume after his MW reign"

and golovkin fans would reply "well we have to wait and see...golovkin is a young 33 and hasnt taken any real damage...he should have many years left in the sport....before we bash his resume lets give him time...who knows he could go to 168 and 175 too..his trainer says he can" and garbage like that...now they are singing a different tune completely

Easy to say it happened but you can't or won't back it up, you've come down to 1 ggg fan saying it in this post where as before it was many comments from ggg fans so what was it, many or 1. If it was such a common comment then surely it wouldn't be very hard to find