Floyd is the best fighter of his era no doubt about it. But he really is a fighter who took no risks and didnt give 2 ****s about the fans or actually entertaining the fans. Hes all about money and thats not a bad thing, but he just lacks those legendary classic fights on his resume.
Part of it is that he fought in a way that was taking zero risks, if he could just jab the whole fight and use his defense to a decision he would. He did not care about entertainment at all, his pre fight all access and 24/7 was more entertaining than most of the actual fights. If he actually wanted to he could have stopped more of his opponents or atleast tried to make it exiting but he never did even though he was capable with his skillset. Thats most fans knock on floyd, hes too risk adverse. Sure if he took more risks he might have lost but he . cares way too much about his "0" . The truth of it is that fans will always love guys like SRL and tommy hearns more and thats why they will be ranked ahead of floyd by most.
Part of it is that he fought in a way that was taking zero risks, if he could just jab the whole fight and use his defense to a decision he would. He did not care about entertainment at all, his pre fight all access and 24/7 was more entertaining than most of the actual fights. If he actually wanted to he could have stopped more of his opponents or atleast tried to make it exiting but he never did even though he was capable with his skillset. Thats most fans knock on floyd, hes too risk adverse. Sure if he took more risks he might have lost but he . cares way too much about his "0" . The truth of it is that fans will always love guys like SRL and tommy hearns more and thats why they will be ranked ahead of floyd by most.
Comment