Floyd Mayweather NEVER DARED TO BE GREAT

[IronDanHamza]

I never said Bradley dominated Provo or Witter, that's why "most" is in the sentence,

There are words "Past" it in Casamayor where Casamayor is categorized, and if you view him as shot so be it, I think he was shot also there. Bradley also won fights where it mattered the most in his prime (Witter, Marquez, Provo, and if you could argue for, Pacquiao) While also dominating good B-level fighters like Vargas and Rios while he was clearly past it.

Campbell unified 135 with 3 belts, that's better than any of Diaz, Lazcano, Manfredy did. Lamont Peterson is clearly better than all the fighters you've mentioned, and yes including Stevie Johnson.

No he's not. Not at all actually. Johnston is way better than Peterson.

How did Provonikov "matter most" it was a fight against a totally unknown unranked WW and he edged it on the "skin of his teeth".

Casamayor and Johnston are 10 times the fighter Witter is

[IronDanHamza]

Right now? I think Crawford is indeed an A-level fighter, but not historically. If he gets beaten by has been's in his prime and loses fights that he isn't suppose to lose while not yet cementing his legacy as an A-level fighter (My standard above) he degrades to a B-level fighter in my eyes. If you argue Wlad, he had dominated like what? 11 years and the amount of rounds he lost in that time span were only like 5 rounds, against B-level comp, so clearly he is A-level and met my standard.

Gennady Golovkin is in my Radar of threatened to be degraded (Historically) of course, because he had a draw on Canelo despite of me viewing it as a robbery. He still didn't rack up the resume and he still didn't unify the MW.

Don't really get what that means.

Crawford is an A level fighter as is Golovkin. That just a fact.

Castillo and Corrales in the early 00's were A level fighters.

[madsweeney]

Don't really get what that means.

Crawford is an A level fighter as is Golovkin. That just a fact.

Castillo and Corrales in the early 00's were A level fighters.

Pretty sure you two are just judging on different basis. He seems to be labeling A level fighters who maintained that level, consistently throughout their career. You seem to include people that were briefly at that level. Personally, I agree with what he is saying, you can't judge a career only by it's peaks, especially when those peaks aren't that high.

[N/A]

Actually he countered his point in detail. It's just Larry is repeating his question over and over again never bothered to know that his question is already answered by the TS

Then answer Larry's question. Give us the name of the fighter.

[Larry the boss]

Actually he countered his point in detail. It's just Larry is repeating his question over and over again never bothered to know that his question is already answered by the TS

who since 1996 is greater then Mayweather Who Floyd did not defeat?

[Larry the boss]

Years from now, floyds boring fights will never be watched due to the fact thats his fights are boring as ****.

Larry would need to re upload and re upload floyds fights so he will be remembered.

No fighter since 1995 ducked prime fighters than floyd. Retire and let them tire.

Low risk, high reward. I only care about money

who since 1996 did more then Mayweather that he did not defeat?

[Xi_]

Who has a better resume than floyd in his era? Y'all pacf@gs are gonna be desperate and moving goalposts to find an answer.

[FeFist]

50 and O

Marquez
Pacquiao
Castillo
Cotto
De La Hoya
Mosley
Corrales
Hatton
Hernandez
Canelo

You split his resume in half and he'd still make it into hall of fame.

[Jedi Vader]

50 and O

Marquez
Pacquiao
Castillo
Cotto
De La Hoya
Mosley
Corrales
Hatton
Hernandez
Canelo

You split his resume in half and he'd still make it into hall of fame.

So true pal.

[BoxingTrav]

He only dared to be elite, but not a Great. He just dared to be elite long enough to be a Great, but never intentionally dared to be Great. Moreover he never fought a great fighter in his prime. 50-0, but rather hollow.

Facts about age
- It's ring age that matters, not 'age'. Pipino Cuevas HOF was finished by 24 years old, Wilfried Benitez also in his 20's, Morales approaching 30. Hopkins was at the elite level in his 40's.
Defensive styles and higher weight classes add to longevity.

Mayweather didn't rise up the weight classes in order to fight greats.
Floyd RETIRES when he doesn't want to fight stylistic threats. He was surrounded by prime Pacquiao, prime Williams, prime Margarito and prime Cotto during 2007-2009 but fought none of them.

Juan Manuel Marquez

1. Outweighed by 4lbs in the weigh in, being involved in one of the biggest catchweight frauds in boxing history.

2. Put on weight the incorrect way. Was slow, chubby. He later put on the weight properly (some boxing ****ysts say potentially by cheating, with him showing visible signs of an HGH gut).

3. Completely stylistically disadvantaged.

Conclusion: Marquez in this condition was poor. Not a great win at all.

Shane Mosley

1. 38 year old, ancient artefact. Relied on speed and athleticism in his younger days - this is what made him great.

2. 1.5 years after his winning performance against tailor-made Antonio Margarito.

3. Shane Mosley of 2007 = razor close war with Cotto.
Shane Mosley of 2000-2003 = razor close war with ATG De La Hoya.
There are many levels between prime De La Hoya and Cotto. That's how far Mosley had fallen since 2007. Now add another 3 years, and you have an archaeological discovery from the Neolithic period.
(Pacquiao gets no credit for this win, either).

Oscar De La Hoya

1. 2007 version of Oscar. He was completely past prime. This was 3 YEARS after his clear loss to Felix Sturm.

2. Oscar had been in wars throughout his whole career, fought so many Great fighters at-or-near their primes. He was war torn and wasn't even seen as much of a boxer anymore.

3. He was depressed, coke addicted. Not bothered about boxing anymore, and was more interested in promoting. He had an awful showing against Steven Forbes immediately after.
(Manny Pacquiao gets no credit for the win over a dead Oscar).

4. Regardless of whether Floyd had to fight at 154, that doesn't actually change the fact that Oscar was completely past prime and couldn't pull the trigger anymore. Floyd had major speed advantages.

5. Prime Oscar had a reputation of losing stamina across the stretch. Now imagine a 2007 version, this effect was even greater. This is what allowed Mayweather to win the last four rounds (I had it 8-4 Mayweather), not any adaptive ability.


Manny Pacquiao

Pacquiao was semi-shot for the following reasons:
NB: Semi-shot doesn't mean 'sucks'

1. Aggressive Style, being well over age 30.

2. The expiration dates of fighters spending the majority of their career in the lower weight classes is far quicker. Manny Pacquiao was from the Light Flyweight, Flyweight, Bantamweight, Featherweight divisions.

3. Manny Pacquiao was completely and utterly war torn. He fell from prime since 2010! He had been in so many wars...against ATG's and elite fighters. The Margarito fight took the prime out of Pacquiao. I can't think of any great fighter in the last 25 years who has been in wars against as many great fighters. He looked so lacklustre against Mosley and Marquez. It was consensus that he was fading, and that he had lost the 'killer instinct'.

4. Mayweather's prime weight was 130 (where he started). His speed, power etc. was greater in those weight classes, he was also younger then.
Pacquiao actually started at 106lbs (Light Flyweight). 6 weight Divisions from 106-130.
Pacquiao's speed, power, athleticism etc. was ECHELONS GREATER at the lower weights. Manny Pacquiao hasn't even knocked anyone out at welterweight since Cotto. So Floyd fought the softest possible Pac.

Mayweather is the naturally bigger man with the considerably bigger frame. I am DISGUSTED he couldn't knock little Pac out, shame on him. To make it worse, he only "beat" him on the basis of a couple of light jabs.

5. Pacquiao's killer instinct was already lost, but the KTFO6 by Marquez 3 YEARS PRIOR to the Mayweather fight, had eliminated all traces of killer instinct. He became so cautious. He was no longer the fighter who would take shots from bigger, HARD PUNCHERS like Cotto, Margarito, Morales, Barrera, Marquez and Hatton, to land his own. Pac at this stage of his career couldn't even walk over a featherfist in Mayweather.

6. Increasing emphasis on pure boxing in his career, especially after being KTFO6 by Marquez. This makes his game more predictable to 'boxers'. His crudeness was decreased, his unorthodox manner of aggression had wilted. KTFO6 made Roach turn a lot more towards pure boxing.
The very thing that Manny had when prime, was lost. His very threat was in his killer instinct, his ability to take punches to land his own, and his crudeness. All three had been diminished.

- This is actually a key point in such discussions.

7. Pacquiao had been more devoted to his career as a congressman, focussing on big boy careers, not mere boxing.

8. Pacquiao had a legitimate shoulder injury that Ellerbe was aware of. Pacquiao had a bad camp due to the injury, unable to take a legal painkiller, too. The OFFICIAL MEDICAL STATEMENT is that Manny Pacquiao had surgery for a torn rotator cuff, a 'significant tear'.

9. Mayweather was apparently so dehydrated that he needed IV's (which are known to be used in sports to mask PED use). Mayweather had the T/E ratio of a 128.5 year old man.

Mayweather is not worthy of much credit for this win over 'number 48'.

Miguel Cotto

1. The late resurgence in Cotto's career has been due to new tactics under Freddie Roach. Cotto wasn't Roach-trained for Mayweather.

2. Cotto before Roach went on to look so flat and mediocre against gatekeeper Austin Trout.

3. This isn't the killer 140lb or 147lb Cotto, by the way. Cotto is past it. War torn.

4. Cotto would be LUCKY to make HOF, and a large part of it will be due to his popularity. Even if he does I don't consider him a great fighter.


Ricky Hatton

1. Mayweather dragged Ricky up to welterweight. Ricky said he didn't feel good there.

2. Ricky Hatton should have lost to Collazo - it was at 147 and he looked bad. Went back down, looked good.


3. Ricky Hatton is no HOF'er. If he gets in, it's largely on the basis of popularity. Definitely not a great fighter.


Jose Luis Castillo

1. In the opinion of many, Mayweather lost the first fight.

2. Rematches always favour the boxer, by the way.

3. Mayweather knows what it's like to have a torn rotator cuff, hence him losing to Castillo. Yet Pacquiao is talked down on for his SIGNIFICANT torn rotator cuff. Where is the medical statement to prove Mayweather had a torn rotator cuff/got surgery for it? Was it even a SIGNIFICANT tear?

4. Mayweather did very well to beat this major stylistic threat in the rematch. Castillo would be LUCKY to make HOF, in my opinion he's definitely not. But if he does, he's on the lowest possible tier and not a great fighter.

Diego Corrales

1. Not a HOF'er. Just very good.

2. Corrales was heavily overweight and had to crash diet, he took the fight because he needed money to pay lawyers. He was severely drained.

Canelo Alvarez

1. Green. Only 22-23 years old.

2. Catchweight king antics by Floyd. Canelo is a real middleweight who was making a mockery of boxing fighting at 154. Floyd dragged him to 152lbs.

3. Canelo was massively stylistically disadvantaged. Can't cut off the ring, plodder with telegraphed punches.

4. Good win despite all of this tbh.


Marcos Rene Maidana

1. Marcos arguably beat Mayweather. Mayweather fanboys consistently have differing views on what rounds Maidana won, thus making a case for a Maidana victory. I had it a draw. A draw against a B grade fighter.

2. Mayweather won the rematch, well done, you beat a B grader.


Genaro Hernandez

1. Clearly aged over night. At 32 years old, he looked very old. He had a long career. Lacked any sort of sharpness or energy.

2. Massively stylistically disadvantaged.


Colon McTapper

1. Self explanatory


Everyone else are just chumps like fat, blown up featherweight Guerrero, quitter Ortiz, Andre 440k PPV Berto, past prime Sharmba Mitchell, Zab Judah who Mayweather should have lost to by disqualification (Roger ran into the ring).

When you hear 25 world champions, are you aware that there are four ‘world champions’ per weight division? Are you aware that boxers can unjustifiably earn a world title against an overmatched opponent without having to fight those who are genuinely seen as THE best? These are belt holders, not ultimate undisputed world champions.

The best boxers lose, especially when they face each other and continue to fight when they’re very past prime. In history, they would fight once every few weeks even if they were carrying injuries into the ring. Hence why they have career records quite like the average Olympic medalists today, who also lose fairly often due to similar schedules.

Fighting at a world championship level for 18 years against 24 champions is a risk. Not only are you trying to diminish Floyd you are discrediting the fighters he fought. If you are to be considered a boxing fan you would know what a tough sport it is and how on any given night any man can be beat and any punch can take anyone out.

The fact remains that Floyd is unbeaten, untied, never been dropped on his @ss, never been dominated. Every time he has been hurt he has weathered the storm. His two closest fights were against Maidana and Castillo, he immediately rematched them. If that's not a risk I don't know what is.

The goal posts have been moved multiple times with Floyd. He's first scared to fight guys then he beats them and he is then discredited..

He has the skills, the resume, the longevity, the IQ, the stats and on top of that he mastered the business game while supposedly being not smart.

Floyd is that ETHER for his detractors, it burns really slow!