5 best heavyweights post Ali (78-) & can anyone current crack it?

[alexguiness]

Lewis
WK
Holmes
VK
Tyson

[DreamFighter]

Several people have also told me that the Earth was flat and they saw Unicorns. Doesn't make those claims any more true!

And yes, there is an illegal punch in the video as I have proven.

there is no illegal punch there. funny that you mention myths though....

Lennox Lewis has never been able to win in any of his other bouts the way he won against Vitali Klitschko.

so...you trying to claim that vitali K is the greatest fighter Lennox faced yeah? hahah. because he lost by tko6 worse than bruno did, ok.

If Lennox Lewis was as good as he was claiming to be and some of his fans claim that he is, then why didn't he beat Vitali Klitschko again in a rematch in the same way that he beat him in the first bout (through damaging his eye again)? Are you going to answer this question?

I'll repeat my answer sure, because he reitred like every HW champ in history by the time or before they reached 38. When r u going to prove that all the HW champs in history SHOULDNT have retired by 38?

why havent you tried to show they were all wrong?

Start with John L Sullivan - prove he should have stayed on till 38. The do Corbett next, and so on up to lewis. When u r finshed post your results - when you done that, I will explain why lewis retired at 38.

[sunny31]

Why are you asking me this question? Did I claim I was 'noone'?



Your incorrect spelling and grammar proves that if anybody is the 'idiot' in this discussion, then it is you!

Do you want to take part in an intelligence test to determine who is more of the 'idiot' and who the less of the 'idiot' is between us both?

Let me know! It can be arranged. Thanks!



I have! Perhaps it's you who needs to comprehend what you're reading properly before you reply?



Several people have also told me that the Earth was flat and they saw Unicorns. Doesn't make those claims any more true!

And yes, there is an illegal punch in the video as I have proven.



Lennox Lewis has never been able to win in any of his other bouts the way he won against Vitali Klitschko. Thus, the way Lennox Lewis beat Vitali Klitschko was from being LUCKY. I.E. A LUCKY + ILLEGAL PUNCH.

If Lennox Lewis was as good as he was claiming to be and some of his fans claim that he is, then why didn't he beat Vitali Klitschko again in a rematch in the same way that he beat him in the first bout (through damaging his eye again)? Are you going to answer this question?



I know he doesn't! Why are you stating this to me?



What is "jose moronho"?

You have been spewing the same **** for years, get over it. Its been 15 years, the guy lost legitimately on cuts, he's not the first, and he won't be the last. End of.

[Mr Objecitivity]

there is no illegal punch there. funny that you mention myths though....




so...you trying to claim that vitali K is the greatest fighter Lennox faced yeah? hahah. because he lost by tko6 worse than bruno did, ok.



I'll repeat my answer sure, because he reitred like every HW champ in history by the time or before they reached 38. When r u going to prove that all the HW champs in history SHOULDNT have retired by 38?

why havent you tried to show they were all wrong?

Start with John L Sullivan - prove he should have stayed on till 38. The do Corbett next, and so on up to lewis. When u r finshed post your results - when you done that, I will explain why lewis retired at 38.

there is no illegal punch there.

There is an illegal punch there. See what I did there?

funny that you mention myths though....

Even funnier that you reject reality.

so...you trying to claim that vitali K is the greatest fighter Lennox faced yeah? hahah. because he lost by tko6 worse than bruno did, ok.

Vitali Klitschko was the greatest fighter Lennox Lewis faced because Vitali Klitschko has the best heavyweight record compared to any of Lennox Lewis's other opponents.

Also, in both bouts, Lennox Lewis won through premature questionable stoppages. Frank Bruno was still standing and so was Vitali Klitschko at the time when THE REFEREE HELPED LENNOX LEWIS TO WIN BY STOPPING THE FIGHT IN FAVOR OF LEWIS.

I'll repeat my answer sure, because he reitred like every HW champ in history by the time or before they reached 38.

He also claimed unlike other heavyweight champions that he is like fine whine that gets better with age. So why didn't he prove those words by beating Vitali Klitschko again in a rematch indisputably and unquestionably?

When r u going to prove that all the HW champs in history SHOULDNT have retired by 38?

I don't have to, because I'm not claiming other HW champs shouldn't have retired at age 38 because other HW champs weren't claiming they are like fine whine that get better with age like Lennox Lewis did.

I'm holding Lennox Lewis to the standard he set for himself through the claims he made.

[Mr Objecitivity]

how you going to arrange an intelligence test versus someone on the internet, genius?
stop writing rubbish, concentrate on replying correctly and this wont be an issue.

how you going to arrange an intelligence test versus someone on the internet, genius?

Not very difficult! We can bet on something and the one who is less intelligent (more idiotic) has to agree on doing something. E.G. Leaving the site for good!

stop writing rubbish, concentrate on replying correctly and this wont be an issue.

How do you write 'rubbish'? My concentration is perfectly fine and my responses are also perfectly fine.

[Mr Objecitivity]

i am replying to your post that "noone said wikipedia is a lie"

That, in turn, was your reply to me telling you that noone is saying wikipedia is lying, the issue is that YOU are lying.

So now I have to ask - are you some kind of returd? Or have you continually ducked each answer deliberately?


which is it?

i am replying to your post that "noone said wikipedia is a lie"

That wasn't my post. My post was the following:

"When did I claim someone said Wikipedia is lying"?

Ergo, you've now just exposed yourself as the 'liar'. Either that, or you've exposed yourself as someone who is somewhat 'idiotic' (the word you've been using to describe me) because you are either deliberately lying about what I actually posted. Or, you are unable to use your relatively lower intelligence to determine what I actually posted. Or you are a combination of both.

the issue is that YOU are lying.

Proof or no reason to believe it happened!

So now I have to ask - are you some kind of returd?

Depends on how you define the word 'returd'. Maybe it is you who is ******ed for using words that don't exist in the English dictionary whilst writing in the English language?

Or have you continually ducked each answer deliberately?

Which answer have I ducked deliberately?

[Mr Objecitivity]

You have been spewing the same **** for years, get over it. Its been 15 years, the guy lost legitimately on cuts, he's not the first, and he won't be the last. End of.

You have been spewing the same **** for years, get over it.

What same '****'?

the guy lost legitimately on cuts

Oh that depends on how you define the word 'legitimately'. If by 'legitimately' you mean after getting struck by an illegal move, then sure, he absolutely did lose 'legitimately'.

[DreamFighter]

What same '****'?



Oh that depends on how you define the word 'legitimately'. If by 'legitimately' you mean after getting struck by an illegal move, then sure, he absolutely did lose 'legitimately'.

he defines legitimately as legitimately, mor.onho. not as moping 15 years later.

[DreamFighter]

That wasn't my post. My post was the following:

"When did I claim someone said Wikipedia is lying"?

exactly, you answered someone elses post, not mine, moron.ho. wiki doesnt tell u the tko6 was illegit.

proof or no reason to believe it happened!

proof of tko6? yeh mate.

Depends on how you define the word 'returd'. Maybe it is you who is ******ed for using words that don't exist in the English dictionary whilst writing in the English language?

and then again maybe its you for openly writing a word that would get you potentially banned. nice one sherlock.

Which answer have I ducked deliberately?

oh you didnt answer any of the 3 in a row that i showed u, dont pretend you dont know.

[DreamFighter]

Not very difficult! We can bet on something and the one who is less intelligent (more idiotic) has to agree on doing something. E.G. Leaving the site for good!

that would suit you well, so you wouldnt have to duck my answers.

whats the intelligence question - was tko6 legit? haha.